SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Principles of Judicial Proof: Or the Process of Proof as Given by Logic, Psychology and General Experience and Illustrated in Judicial Trials
0 references·5 citing·18 second hop
The Principles of Judicial Proof: Or the Process of Proof as Given by Logic, Psychology and General Experience and Illustrated in Judicial Trials (1931)The Principles of Judicial Proof: Or the …Combining evidence in complex cases - a practical approach to interdisciplinary casework (2019)Combining evidence in complex…To catch a thief with and without numbers: arguments, scenarios and probabilities in evidential reasoning (2014)To catch a thief with and wit…LÓGICA, CIENCIA Y EXPERIENCIA EN LA VALORACIÓN DE LA PRUEBA (2014)LÓGICA, CIENCIA Y EXPERIENCIA…Peer-monitoring vs. micro-script fading for enhancing knowledge acquisition when learning in computer-supported argumentation environments (2012)Peer-monitoring vs. micro-scr…Wigmore's Chart Method (2000)Wigmore's Chart MethodThe New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation (1971)Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: a pragma-dialectical perspective (1992)The Uses of Argument (2003)Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (1978)The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. (1996)First- and second-order scaffolding of argumentation competence and domain-specific knowledge acquisition: a systematic review (2019)Historical and Practical Considerations regarding Expert Testimony (1901)Profiles, probabilities, and stereotypes (2004)Minority Cultures and the Cosmopolitan Alternative (2025)Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding : an inquiry into human knowledge structures. By Roger C. Schank and Robert P. Abelson. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1977. Pp. 248. (1978)Coherence in Thought and Action (2000)Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011)Assessment criteria or standards of proof? An effort in clarification (2018)Narration in judiciary fact-finding: a probabilistic explication (2018)The Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning. (1995)A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework (1998)A model for case assessment and interpretation (1998)Interpol review of paint, tape, and glass evidence 2019–2022 (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2012Peer-monitoring vs. micro-script fading for enhancing knowledge acquisition when learning in computer-supported argumentation environments44 cited
  • 2014To catch a thief with and without numbers: arguments, scenarios and probabilities in evidential reasoning31 cited
  • 2000Wigmore's Chart Method27 cited
  • 2019Combining evidence in complex cases - a practical approach to interdisciplinary casework25 cited
  • 2014LÓGICA, CIENCIA Y EXPERIENCIA EN LA VALORACIÓN DE LA PRUEBA10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work