SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evaluating the Evaluators
0 references·7 citing·30 second hop
Evaluating the Evaluators (1981)Evaluating the EvaluatorsThe Importance of Resubmitting Rejected Papers (2007)The Importance of Resubmittin…academic heavy-weights: the ‘relevance’ of political science journals (2007)academic heavy-weights: the ‘…Designing Academic Audit: Lessons learned in Europe and Asia (2000)Designing Academic Audit: Les…Disseminating Scholarly Output (1994)Disseminating Scholarly OutputReliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review (1991)Reliability, fairness, object…Referee agreement in context (1991)Referee agreement in contextDoes group discussion contribute reliability of complex judgments? (1991)Does group discussion contrib…Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics (1992)The Clash of Civilizations? (1993)What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data (1995)Isoliert oder gut vernetzt? Eine vergleichende Exploration der Publikationspraxis in der PVS (2009)What Happens at the Journal Office Stays at the Journal Office: Assessing Journal Transparency and Record-Keeping Practices (2011)Peers under pressure (2001)The counting house (2002)Why impact factors don't work for taxonomy (2002)``Circle the Wagons and Defend the Faith'' (2008)The Importance of Encouraging Librarians to Publish in Peer-Reviewed Publications (2012)Rejected papers in academic publishing: Turning negatives into positives to maximize paper acceptance (2024)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Individual versus general structured feedback to improve agreement in grant peer review: a randomized controlled trial (2021)Peer reviewer topic choice and its impact on interrater reliability: A mixed-method study (2022)Variability and negligence: grant peer review panels evaluating impact ex ante (2024)Emerging Patterns of Social Demand and University Reform: Through a Glass Darkly (1995)Higher education markets and public policy (1997)Adaptive University Structures: An Analysis of Adaptation to Socioeconomic Environments of US and European Universities (1999)Quality in Higher Education (2007)Quality in Norwegian Higher Education: A review of research on aspects affecting student learning (2015)Quality in higher education institutions: insights from the literature (2018)A Manuscript Masquerade (1980)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Simultaneous Multiple Journal Submissions: The Case Against (1994)The Review Process in Economics: Is It Too Fast? (2005)Ranking Journals Following a Matching Model Approach: An Application to Public Economics Journals (2008)An auction market for journal articles (2009)Research Program Peer Review: Purposes, Principles, Practices, Protocols (2004)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2000Designing Academic Audit: Lessons learned in Europe and Asia95 cited
  • 1991Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review55 cited
  • 1994Disseminating Scholarly Output24 cited
  • 2007The Importance of Resubmitting Rejected Papers15 cited
  • 2007academic heavy-weights: the ‘relevance’ of political science journals15 cited
  • 1991Referee agreement in context12 cited
  • 1991Does group discussion contribute reliability of complex judgments?0 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work