Green Bargaining Theory: The Foundations of Environmental Sustainability in the Organized Workplace

Abstract

Green bargaining—the incorporation of environmental provisions into collective agreements—has emerged as a notable yet under-theorized feature of contemporary employment relations. While organizational sustainability research has traditionally emphasized managerial initiative, regulation, or market incentives, collective agreements can also serve as sites where environmental commitments are articulated, specified, and contested. This article develops a theoretical framework to explain why green clauses produce divergent outcomes in practice. Rather than treating such provisions as static contractual artifacts, the framework conceptualizes green clauses as evolving over time, shaped by bargaining dynamics, workplace governance processes, and feedback from prior outcomes. Some clauses become substantively embedded in organizational practice, while others remain symbolic, lapse into inactivity, or are removed altogether. The analysis advances three propositions that correspond to key phases of clause development. First, green clauses tend to emerge and diffuse through structured sectoral and union networks rather than appearing randomly across workplaces. Second, environmental provisions are more likely to translate into workplace practice when they appear in clusters alongside governance infrastructure such as committees and monitoring mechanisms. Third, clause outcomes evolve across bargaining cycles, with provisions strengthening, stagnating, or deteriorating as governance support changes. By focusing on clause trajectories rather than adoption alone, this article contributes to industrial relations scholarship on negotiated governance and organizational change. It highlights both the potential and the fragility of collectively negotiated sustainability commitments and provides a foundation for empirical research on green clauses within workplace governance systems.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 2 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.