References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

• 2003What We Really Value: Beyond Rubrics in Teaching and Assessing Writing264 cited
• 2008“Mistakes Are a Fact of Life”: A National Comparative Study149 cited
• 1997Revising for meaning: Effects of knowledge and strategy.129 cited
• 2012Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing studies108 cited
• 2001Ethos and Error: How Business People React to Errors88 cited
• 2000Response and the social construction of error73 cited
• 2014Professional and Technical Communication in a Web 2.0 World72 cited
• 1987A Study of Professional and Experienced Writers Revising and Editing at the Computer and with Pen and Paper71 cited
• 1997The impact of writer nationality on mainstream teachers' judgments of composition quality67 cited
• 2014Theorizing Failure in US Writing Assessments67 cited
• 2011Linguistic discrimination in writing assessment: How raters react to African American “errors,” ESL errors, and standard English errors on a state-mandated writing exam59 cited
• 1990Language in Change: Academics' and Executives' Perceptions of Usage Errors47 cited
• 2007Evaluating ESL: Making sense of university professors’ responses to second language writing46 cited
• 1992Rethinking the “sociality” of error: Teaching editing as negotiation