Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The Motivation Assessment Scale: Reliability and Construct Validity Across Three Topographies of Behavior 11Funds for this study were obtained from The Winckelsteegh Residential Facility and Stichting Behandeling en Onderzoek Zwakzinnigen. Helga Langkamp is greatly acknowledged for her assistance.

11 references·3 citing·42 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1986Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain.3,135 cited
1994TOWARD A FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF SELF‐INJURY2,641 cited
1988Identifying the variables maintaining self-injurious behavior650 cited
1997Meta-analytic study on treatment effectiveness for problem behaviors with individuals who have mental retardation.308 cited
1991Reliability analysis of the motivation assessment scale: A failure to replicate200 cited
1995Beliefs and emotional reactions of care staff working with people with challenging behaviour186 cited
1985Functional taxonomy of stereotypic and self-injurious behavior.68 cited
1994Interrater reliability of the motivation assessment scale: Failure to replicate with aggressive behavior66 cited
1991The Motivation Assessment Scale: inter‐rater reliability and internal consistency in a British sample62 cited
1989Reinforcer Assessment I: Using Problem Behavior to Select Reinforcers61 cited
1989The Motivation Assessment Scale.56 cited

Cited by

2007The relationship between psychiatric symptomatology and motivation of challenging behaviour: A preliminary study44 cited
2003Functional Behavior Assessment Rating Scales: Intrarater Reliability with Students with Emotional or Behavioral Disorders40 cited
2005Motivation assessment scale.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

4 cited