Histories of public relations

Oliver Raaz · Stefan Wehmeier

26 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Communication Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Public Relations and Crisis Communication Media Studies and Communication Rhetoric and Communication Studies

Abstract

Purpose This paper seeks to compare different national PR histories in order to unfold the degree of abstract reflection in PR history writing. It aims to provide some suggestions for a future PR historiography, based on this comparison. Design/methodology/approach The paper compares British, German, and US American PR historiography. The study is based on a comparison of 36 PR histories. A triple matrix of theoretization is used in order to differentiate the histories. Findings Within the comparison American PR historiography accounts for 24 public relations history approaches, whereas Great Britain (1) and Germany (11) offer fewer histories. However, this richness in quantity does not lead to theoretical diversification. Owing to the paradigmatic obligation to a progressivist understanding, American PR historiography actually entails only one theoretic approach, while its German equivalent includes three different theoretic approaches and British PR historiography – being at its start – at least contains one explicitly non‐progressivist, methodologically well‐informed, fact‐oriented example. Paradoxically, the prevailing American PR historiography, on the one hand, conceptualizes PR as a modern phenomenon but, on the other hand, claims even ancient beginnings. Research limitations/implications The corpus of analysis contains only studies that attempt to supply an encompassing overview of (national) PR history. Practical implications Public relations managers may use these findings to achieve a more nuanced critical understanding of the history of their occupation, and thereby reflect on its current state, which may lead to intensified ethical endeavours. Originality/value The paper presents a pioneer systematic comparison of the three national PR histories, which may lead to enhanced national and general PR historiography. Another value is the establishment of a theoretically informed comparative measuring instrument, which (in future) can also be applied in order to compare and improve other national PR historiographies.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 26 citations exist upstream.

References

1963The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 1997The Tacit Dimension 1975Metahistory. The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe.2018MANAGING PUBLIC RELATIONS 1992Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft 1967Effective Public Relations 1992Public relations: Strategies and tactics 1982Public Relations: The Profession and the Practice

Cited by

2014Toward an historically informed Asian model of public relations 2014From ad-man to digital manager 2015Problems of Public Relations Historiography and Perspectives of a Functional-Integrative Stratification Model 2013Der Diskurs über PR-Geschichte und PR-Historiographie in Deutschland und international 2015What in the World is Public Relations?2014The history of public relations in Greece from 1950 to 1980: Professionalization of the “art”2018

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.