An historical analysis of HRD knowledge

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this article is to analyze the historical development of HRD knowledge. The analysis aims to use the qualitative research technique of text deconstruction on an important management text from the human relations phase of organization theory. Deconstruction is not a common method to HRD. In this paper, HRD scholars interested in how HRD knowledge and theories are created are given this tool to expose implicit assumptions. Design/methodology/approach The article uses text deconstruction, based on Bradshaw. Findings The deconstruction identified several beliefs that suggest that Roethlisberger was operating from a masculine epistemological perspective. Two clusters of findings emerged: one cluster revolved around the role of the researcher, and the other cluster revolved around the role of gender. Research limitations/implications Postpositivist perspectives on knowledge generation and theory building in HRD are limited. Post‐structural analyses need to be considered. Practical implications The article exposes how a gendered history influenced HRD scholarship and practice, and provides suggestions for future scholarship and practice. Originality/value Legitimizes text deconstruction as an integral research tool for HRD.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 16 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.