Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The effects of figure size feedback (positive vs. negative) and target comparison group (particularistic vs. universalistic) on body image disturbance

16 references·1 citing·47 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1954A Theory of Social Comparison Processes20,836 cited
1988Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders12,627 cited
1983Development and validation of a multidimensional eating disorder inventory for anorexia nervosa and bulimia4,538 cited
2002Resilience in the Face of Catastrophe: Optimism, Personality, and Coping in the Kosovo Crisis2,164 cited
1989Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes.1,955 cited
1992Body Images: Development, Deviance, and Change873 cited
1991Psychometric qualities of the figure rating scale360 cited
1985The measurement of self-esteem: Refining our methods.335 cited
1990Classic and current social comparison research: Expanding the perspective.326 cited
1991Development and validation of the Physical Appearance State and Trait Anxiety Scale (PASTAS)258 cited
1991The Physical Appearance Comparison Scale249 cited
1990Body image disturbance: assessment and treatment189 cited
1987Cognitive-behavioral treatment of women's body-image dissatisfaction.179 cited
1986Psychological and behavioral correlates of feeling fat in women176 cited
1988Particularistic and universalistic evaluation in the social comparison process.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

158 cited

1986Body size distortion and self-esteem in asymptomatic, normal weight males and females112 cited

Cited by

1996Feminist explanations of the development of eating disorders: Common themes, research findings, and methodological issues.61 cited