Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Peer Review Verfahren auf dem Prüfstand / Peer Review Research – Reviewed

16 references·16 citing·38 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1988Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science1,482 cited
1982Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again1,071 cited
1977Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system1,013 cited
1971Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system790 cited
1991Writing biology: texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge760 cited
1981Chance and Consensus in Peer Review623 cited
1990How to write and publish a scientific paper569 cited
1991The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation496 cited
1983The Hierarchy of the Sciences?485 cited
2016Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication481 cited
2008Rhetoric of Science463 cited
2016The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review425 cited
1994How Are the Mighty Fallen: Rejected Classic Articles by Leading Economists389 cited
2001Die Stunde der Wahrheit? : zum Verhältnis der Wissenschaft zu Politik, Wirtschaft und Medien in der Wissensgesellschaft308 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1990The Rhetorical Turn277 cited

1990A rhetoric of science: inventing scientific discourse272 cited

Cited by

2009Peer review of grant applications in biology and medicine. Reliability, fairness, and validity77 cited
2008Do editors and referees look for signs of scientific misconduct when reviewing manuscripts? A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication66 cited
2020Criteria for assessing grant applications: a systematic review59 cited
2010Scientific Communication: Sociology Journals and Publication Practices55 cited
2018Internationalizing a national scientific community? Changes in publication and citation practices in Chile, 1976–201534 cited
2022Towards theorizing peer review33 cited
2014How Editors Decide. Oral Communication in Journal Peer Review30 cited
2006Undisciplined research: the proceduralisation of quality control in transdisciplinary projects30 cited
2006Drittmittel und Publikationen25 cited
2024Peer-review procedures as practice, decision, and governance—the road to theories of peer review22 cited
2010Selbststeuerung der Wissenschaft: Peer Review22 cited
2005Advantages and dangers of ‘remote’ peer evaluation22 cited
2011Scholarly Communication in Education Journals19 cited
2008Reviewers' Views on Reviewing: An Examination of the Peer Review Process in Criminal Justice19 cited
2021Do peers share the same criteria for assessing grant applications?15 cited
2024How do referees integrate evaluation criteria into their overall judgment? Evidence from grant peer review13 cited