SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Peer review in the National Science Foundation: Phase two of a study
0 references·16 citing·56 second hopsampled
Peer review in the National Science Foundation: Phase two of a study (1981)Peer review in the National Science Found…The Influence of Peer Reviewer Expertise on the Evaluation of Research Funding Applications (2016)The Influence of Peer Reviewe…Legitimate judgment in art, the scientific world reversed? Maintaining critical distance in evaluation (2013)Legitimate judgment in art, t…Comparing self-regulation and statutory regulation: Evidence from the accounting profession (2012)Comparing self-regulation and…Communicating and compromising on disciplinary expertise in the peer review of research proposals (2012)Communicating and compromisin…Comparing Customary Rules of Fairness: Evaluative Practices in Various Types of Peer Review Panels (2011)Comparing Customary Rules of …Peer review of grant applications in biology and medicine. Reliability, fairness, and validity (2009)Peer review of grant applicat…Cost of the NSERC Science Grant Peer Review System Exceeds the Cost of Giving Every Qualified Researcher a Baseline Grant (2009)Cost of the NSERC Science Gra…Scientific Peer Review: An Analysis of the Peer Review Process from the Perspective of Sociology of Science Theories (2008)Scientific Peer Review: An Ana…Beyond blind faith: overcoming the obstacles to interdisciplinary evaluation (2006)Beyond blind faith: overcomin…Competition for funding as an indicator of research competitiveness (2005)Competition for funding as an…Advancing Scientific Research in Education (2004)Advancing Scientific Research…Federal research impact assessment: Axioms, approaches, applications (1995)Federal research impact asses…Citation counts and social comparisons: Scientists' use and evaluation of citation index data (1990)Citation counts and social co…Do Journal Rejection Rates Index Consensus? (1988)Do Journal Rejection Rates In…A Computer Program for Determining the Reliability of Dimensionally Scaled Data when the Numbers and Specific Sets of Examiners may Vary at Each Assessment (1988)A Computer Program for Determ…A Century of Science in Agriculture: Lessons for Science Policy (1986)A Century of Science in Agric…EQUALITY OF EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY (1968)Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (1978)Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice (1983)The state of qualitative inquiry: A contested science (2006)Positivist Dogmas, Rhetoric, and the Education Science Question (2009)Mixed Methods, Triangulation, and Causal Explanation (2012)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Equivalence of Weighted Kappa and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as Measures of Reliability (1973)MISINTERPRETATION AND MISUSE OF THE KAPPA STATISTIC (1987)THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF EVALUATION OF SCHOLARLY PERFORMANCE (1988)Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review (1991)Collaboration in sociology and other scientific disciplines: A comparative trend analysis of scholarship in the social, physical, and mathematical sciences (1999)The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research (1959)Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention (1962)Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts (1986)Does competitive research funding encourage diversity in higher education? (2008)Two-level DEA approaches in research evaluation (2008)Mobility versus job stability: Assessing tenure and productivity outcomes (2010)Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (1970)Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (1976)Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. (1981)Scientometric indicators: peer-review, bibliometric methods and conflict of interests (2010)Alternatives to Peer Review: Novel Approaches for Research Evaluation (2011)The leaky pipeline in research grant peer review and funding decisions: challenges and future directions (2020)A Theory of Social Comparison Processes (1954)The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. (1973)Visibility and Dissemination of Women's and Men's Sociological Scholarship (1992)The Game Academics Play: Editors versus Authors (2005)The Theory of the Leisure Class (2009)Quality, impact, and quantification: Indicators and metrics use by social scientists (2018)Management. Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices. (1975)Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1984)Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1991)Social Simulation That 'Peers into Peer Review' (2011)Using simplified peer review processes to fund research: a prospective study (2015)Publish and Who Should Perish: You or Science? (2018)Outline of a Theory of Practice (1977)Outline of a Theory of Practice. (1980)„Wir leben im Zeitalter der Vergleichung.“ Perspektiven einer Soziologie des Vergleichs (2016)Gender and the Artist Archetype: Understanding Gender Inequality in Artistic Careers (2016)Emotions and Knowledge in Expert Work: A Comparison of Two Psychotherapies (2017)Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* (2018)Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes (1985)Commensuration as a Social Process (1998)The Sociology of Critical Capacity (1999)Beyond Academia – Interrogating Research Impact in the Research Excellence Framework (2016)The Evaluation Scale: Exploring Decisions About Societal Impact in Peer Review Panels (2016)Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks (2001)Where is disciplinarity going? Meeting on the borderland (2011)Sociological Innovation through Subfield Integration (2014)The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1975)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Peer Review: A System under Stress (2017)THE SOCIOLOGY OF SCIENCE:: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (2017)What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences? (2017)Research funding: past performance is a stronger predictor of future scientific output than reviewer scores (2020)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2004Advancing Scientific Research in Education127 cited
  • 2013Legitimate judgment in art, the scientific world reversed? Maintaining critical distance in evaluation87 cited
  • 2006Beyond blind faith: overcoming the obstacles to interdisciplinary evaluation79 cited
  • 2009Peer review of grant applications in biology and medicine. Reliability, fairness, and validity77 cited
  • 2016The Influence of Peer Reviewer Expertise on the Evaluation of Research Funding Applications75 cited
  • 2005Competition for funding as an indicator of research competitiveness74 cited
  • 2012Communicating and compromising on disciplinary expertise in the peer review of research proposals73 cited
  • 1988Do Journal Rejection Rates Index Consensus?66 cited
  • 1990Citation counts and social comparisons: Scientists' use and evaluation of citation index data62 cited
  • 2009Cost of the NSERC Science Grant Peer Review System Exceeds the Cost of Giving Every Qualified Researcher a Baseline Grant55 cited
  • 2012Comparing self-regulation and statutory regulation: Evidence from the accounting profession55 cited
  • 2008Scientific Peer Review: An Analysis of the Peer Review Process from the Perspective of Sociology of Science Theories53 cited
  • 1988A Computer Program for Determining the Reliability of Dimensionally Scaled Data when the Numbers and Specific Sets of Examiners may Vary at Each Assessment

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

51 cited
  • 2011Comparing Customary Rules of Fairness: Evaluative Practices in Various Types of Peer Review Panels50 cited
  • 1986A Century of Science in Agriculture: Lessons for Science Policy50 cited
  • 1995Federal research impact assessment: Axioms, approaches, applications45 cited