SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Study design, originality and overall consistency influence acceptance or rejection of manuscripts submitted to the Journal
11 references·16 citing·33 second hop
Study design, originality and overall consistency influence acceptance or rejection of manuscripts submitted to the Journal (2004)Study design, originality and overall con…Review criteria for research manuscripts. (2001)Review criteria for research …Reasons Reviewers Reject and Accept Manuscripts (2001)Reasons Reviewers Reject and …In Defense of Case Reports and Case Series (2001)In Defense of Case Reports an…What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal? (1998)What Makes a Good Reviewer an…US and Non-US Submissions (1998)US and Non-US SubmissionsPolicies, practices, and attitudes of north american medical journal editors (1995)Policies, practices, and atti…Multiple blinded reviews of the same two manuscripts. Effects of referee characteristics and publication language (1994)Multiple blinded reviews of t…The characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good-quality reviews (1993)The characteristics of peer r…Quotational and reference accuracy in surgical journals. A continuing peer review problem (1990)Quotational and reference acc…Quotational and Reference Accuracy in Surgical Journals (1990)Quotational and Reference Acc…Do authors check their references? A survey of accuracy of references in three public health journals. (1987)Do authors check their refere…What feedback do reviewers give when reviewing qualitative manuscripts? A focused mapping review and synthesis (2020)What feedback do reviewers gi…Reading Peer Review (2020)Reading Peer ReviewRejection of Manuscripts: Problems and Solutions (2018)Rejection of Manuscripts: Pro…Reasons for Manuscript Rejection After Peer Review From the Journal Headache (2018)Reasons for Manuscript Reject…Uma Análise Comparativa dos Fatores de Rejeição nos Periódicos de Diferentes Estratos de Administração (2016)Uma Análise Comparativa dos F…Ready! Aim! Fire! targeting the right medical science journal (2016)Ready! Aim! Fire! targeting t…Motivos de rejeição dos artigos nos periódicos de administração (2016)Motivos de rejeição dos artig…Rejection of Good Manuscripts: Possible Reasons, Consequences and Solutions (2015)Rejection of Good Manuscripts…“Why We Say No! A Look Through the Editor’s Eye” (2015)“Why We Say No! A Look Throug…How to Write Articles That Get Published (2014)How to Write Articles That Ge…What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: Analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection (2013)What is submitted and what ge…Mistakes encountered in manuscripts on education and their effects on journal rejections (2013)Mistakes encountered in manus…A content analysis of referees’ comments: how do comments on manuscripts rejected by a high-impact journal and later published in either a low- or high-impact journal differ? (2009)A content analysis of referee…What a reviewer wants (2008)What a reviewer wantsSuccessful publishing: How to get your paper accepted (2008)Successful publishing: How to…Factors influencing editors' decision on acceptance or rejection of manuscripts: the authors' perspective. (2008)Factors influencing editors' …Conjectures and refutations : the growth of scientific knowledge (1972)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration (2014)How accurate are quotations and references in medical journals? (1985)Integration of statistical methods and judgment for time series forecasting: principles from empirical research (1998)Quotation accuracy in medical journal articles —a systematic review and meta-analysis (2015)Case study in major quotation errors: a critical commentary on the Newcastle–Ottawa scale (2018)The Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses (1965)Association Between Funding and Quality of Published Medical Education Research (2007)Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review (2007)Limited by our limitations (2019)A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine (1986)A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine (1992)ORI Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of Research (2004)What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them? (2008)Teaching and physics education research: bridging the gap (2014)Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review (1998)Open peer review: A randomised controlled trial (2000)Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial (2004)How to Review a Manuscript: A "Down-to-Earth" Approach (2004)Reviewers' perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal (2004)A Rubric to Assess Critical Literature Evaluation Skills (2007)Testing and adjusting for publication bias (2001)Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors (2007)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)Association of Journal Quality Indicators With Methodological Quality of Clinical Research Articles (2002)Uses and misuses of the STROBE statement: bibliographic study (2011)Publication and related biases. (2000)How Much Better Are the Most-Prestigious Journals? The Statistics of Academic Publication (2005)Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research (1998)Ranking Games (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2001In Defense of Case Reports and Case Series564 cited
  • 1998US and Non-US Submissions318 cited
  • 1998What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?266 cited
  • 2001Reasons Reviewers Reject and Accept Manuscripts235 cited
  • 1990Quotational and reference accuracy in surgical journals. A continuing peer review problem176 cited
  • 1994Multiple blinded reviews of the same two manuscripts. Effects of referee characteristics and publication language158 cited
  • 1993The characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good-quality reviews150 cited
  • 1990Quotational and Reference Accuracy in Surgical Journals129 cited
  • 1987Do authors check their references? A survey of accuracy of references in three public health journals.114 cited
  • 2001Review criteria for research manuscripts.79 cited
  • 1995Policies, practices, and attitudes of north american medical journal editors77 cited

Cited by

  • 2008Successful publishing: How to get your paper accepted52 cited
  • 2009A content analysis of referees’ comments: how do comments on manuscripts rejected by a high-impact journal and later published in either a low- or high-impact journal differ?47 cited
  • 2013What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: Analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

34 cited
  • 2018Reasons for Manuscript Rejection After Peer Review From the Journal Headache34 cited
  • 2020What feedback do reviewers give when reviewing qualitative manuscripts? A focused mapping review and synthesis31 cited
  • 2014How to Write Articles That Get Published29 cited
  • 2015“Why We Say No! A Look Through the Editor’s Eye”22 cited
  • 2016Motivos de rejeição dos artigos nos periódicos de administração17 cited
  • 2008What a reviewer wants16 cited
  • 2020Reading Peer Review14 cited
  • 2008Factors influencing editors' decision on acceptance or rejection of manuscripts: the authors' perspective.14 cited
  • 2016Uma Análise Comparativa dos Fatores de Rejeição nos Periódicos de Diferentes Estratos de Administração13 cited
  • 2016Ready! Aim! Fire! targeting the right medical science journal13 cited
  • 2018Rejection of Manuscripts: Problems and Solutions13 cited
  • 2013Mistakes encountered in manuscripts on education and their effects on journal rejections12 cited
  • 2015Rejection of Good Manuscripts: Possible Reasons, Consequences and Solutions11 cited