SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How Judges Sentence
0 references·5 citing·21 second hop
How Judges Sentence (2005)How Judges SentenceBeyond Judicial Solitude: Listening in the Politics of Criminal Sentencing (2024)Beyond Judicial Solitude: Lis…Why sentence? Comparing the views of jurors, judges and the legislature on the purposes of sentencing in Victoria, Australia (2017)Why sentence? Comparing the v…Judging in lower courts: Conventional, procedural, therapeutic and feminist approaches (2016)Judging in lower courts: Conv…Public preferences for sentencing purposes: What difference does offender age, criminal history and offence type make? (2011)Public preferences for senten…Sentencing in the Children’s Court: An Ethnographic Perspective (2007)Sentencing in the Children’s …The Professional Thief (1938)Crime, Shame and Reintegration (1989)Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (1990)Judicial Censure and Moral Communication to Youth Sex Offenders (2008)Researching the Judiciary: Exploring the Invisible in Judicial Decision Making (2008)Sentencing “Unwanted” Migrants: the Border, Racism, and Narrating Punishability (2020)Americans View Crime and Justice: A National Public Opinion Survey (1996)Sentencing and Criminal Justice (2005)Penal populism, sentencing councils and sentencing policy (2014)Stakeholder Sentencing (2014)The association of gender role attitudes and offense type with public punitiveness toward male and female offenders (2018)Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services (1981)In A Different Voice: Psychological Theory And Women's Development (1982)In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. (1983)Feminist Judgments on the UK Supreme Court (2020)The Working Culture of Legal Aid Lawyers: Developing a ‘Shared Orientation Model’ (2021)An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. (2009)Sentencing and Criminal Justice (2010)Pluralism and Reasonable Disagreement (1994)Between Facts and Norms (1996)Democracy and disagreement (1997)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2007Sentencing in the Children’s Court: An Ethnographic Perspective29 cited
  • 2011Public preferences for sentencing purposes: What difference does offender age, criminal history and offence type make?27 cited
  • 2016Judging in lower courts: Conventional, procedural, therapeutic and feminist approaches23 cited
  • 2017Why sentence? Comparing the views of jurors, judges and the legislature on the purposes of sentencing in Victoria, Australia15 cited
  • 2024Beyond Judicial Solitude: Listening in the Politics of Criminal Sentencing12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work