Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

No pain, no gain? The importance of measuring course workload in student ratings of instruction.

10 references·16 citing·42 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1992Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit27,192 cited
1954A Theory of Social Comparison Processes20,836 cited
1996Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling.10,386 cited
1959The Social Psychology of Groups5,898 cited
1984Students' evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential baises, and utility.1,017 cited
2004Level of aspiration.866 cited
1981Student Ratings of Instruction and Student Achievement: A Meta-analysis of Multisection Validity Studies819 cited
1990Applications of covariance structure modeling in psychology: Cause for concern?638 cited
1979Student Ratings of Faculty: A Reprise289 cited
1988Implementation Problems in Meta-Analysis118 cited

Cited by

2000Student Evaluations of Teaching: An Exploratory Study of the Faculty Response235 cited
2020Student Evaluations of Teaching Encourages Poor Teaching and Contributes to Grade Inflation: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis222 cited
2004Web-based student evaluations of professors: the relations between perceived quality, easiness and sexiness187 cited
2020On students’ (mis)judgments of learning and teaching effectiveness.159 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2010Student evaluation of courses: what predicts satisfaction?148 cited

2007Management by results: Student evaluation of faculty teaching and the mis-measurement of performance142 cited

2008I liked your course because you taught me well: The influence of grades, workload, expectations and goals on students' evaluations of teaching128 cited

2016Why Good Teaching Evaluations May Reward Bad Teaching123 cited

2010National Student Survey: are differences between universities and courses reliable and meaningful?108 cited

2001Distinguishing Between Good (Useful) and Bad Workloads on Students’ Evaluations of Teaching101 cited

2002Multimedia comprehension skill predicts differential outcomes of web-based and lecture courses.99 cited

2003Are Student Evaluations of Teaching Valid? Evidence From an Analytical Business Core Course98 cited

2011Quality of e-learners’ time and learning performance beyond quantitative time-on-task96 cited

2002Student and Faculty Perceptions of Student Evaluations of Teaching: A Study of Similarities and Differences93 cited

2004Grading leniency, grade discrepancy, and student ratings of instruction92 cited

2010Assessing student workload in Problem Based Learning: Relationships among teaching method, student workload and achievement. A case study in Natural Sciences92 cited