SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Who Submits Work to JMCQ and Why? A Demographic Profile and Belief Summary
12 references·1 citing·50 second hop
Who Submits Work to JMCQ and Why? A Demographic Profile and Belief Summary (2014)Who Submits Work to JMCQ and Why? A Demog…Gender Gaps in North American Research Productivity: Examining Faculty Publication Rates in Mexico, Canada, and the U.S. (2011)Gender Gaps in North American…Testing for the Presence of Positive-Outcome Bias in Peer Review (2010)Testing for the Presence of P…Problems with peer review (2010)Problems with peer reviewIf at first you don't succeed, try, try again: Understanding race, age, and gender differences in retesting score improvement. (2010)If at first you don't succeed…What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them? (2008)What errors do peer reviewers…Problems in the Pipeline: Gender, Marriage, and Fertility in the Ivory Tower (2008)Problems in the Pipeline: Gen…Sex Differences in Response to Evaluative Feedback: A Field Study (2002)Sex Differences in Response t…Individual differences in attributional style (2002)Individual differences in att…Editorial peer review (2001)Editorial peer reviewHow Well Does a Journal's Peer Review Process Function? (1994)How Well Does a Journal's Pee…Peer Review Practices of Mass Communication Scholarly Journals (1990)Peer Review Practices of Mass…Evaluating Scholarly Manuscripts in Journalism and Communications (1982)Evaluating Scholarly Manuscri…How Media Scholars’ Attributes Affect Their Ratings of Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly (2015)How Media Scholars’ Attribute…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research (2013)Editorial: Evidence on Questionable Research Practices: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly (2016)SPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials (2025)Society and the Adolescent Self-Image (1965)Cultural diversity in organizations : theory, research, and practice (1993)Personal Networks of Women and Minorities in Management: A Conceptual Framework (1993)A Persuasive Robot to Stimulate Energy Conservation: The Influence of Positive and Negative Social Feedback and Task Similarity on Energy-Consumption Behavior (2013)Performance feedback, power retention, and the gender gap in leadership (2017)Evaluating the effectiveness of performance management: A 30-year integrative conceptual review. (2019)Peer review in biomedical publication (1974)The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review (1990)The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)Who Benefits from Peer Review? An Analysis of the Outcome of 100 Requests for Review by Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (2005)The predictive validity of peer review: A selective review of the judgmental forecasting qualities of peers, and implications for innovation in science (2010)A concept for inferring ‘frontier research’ in grant proposals (2013)Chronicle of Higher Education (1996)Faculty Time Allocations and Research Productivity: Gender, Race and Family Effects (1999)Women in science: career processes and outcomes (2004)Inequality in Academic Knowledge Production (2015)Is there any feedback effect between academic research publication and research collaboration? Evidence from an Australian university (2015)Increasing Research Productivity in Undergraduate Research Experiences: Exploring Predictors of Collaborative Faculty–Student Publications (2017)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Adherence to reporting guidelines increases the number of citations: the argument for including a methodologist in the editorial process and peer-review (2019)Ten strategies for avoiding and overcoming authorship conflicts in academic publishing (2021)The impact of peer review on the contribution potential of scientific papers (2021)Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria (2002)Funding grant proposals for scientific research: retrospective analysis of scores by members of grant review panel (2011)Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability (2016)Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central (2016)Personnel Selection in Organizations (1993)Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. (1996)The g factor: the science of mental ability (1998)The effects of medium and sequence on personality trait assessments in face‐to‐face and videoconference selection interviews: Implications for HR analytics (2021)The Time Bind (1997)Unbending gender: why family and work conflict and what to do about it (2000)Four Decades of Trends in Attitudes Toward Family Issues in the United States: The 1960s Through the 1990s (2001)‘Different people have different priorities’: work–family balance, gender, and the discourse of choice (2013)Do Babies Matter? (2019)The unequal impact of parenthood in academia (2021)The measurement of psychological androgyny. (1974)Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. (1977)RESEARCH SECTION: Why do students think they fail? The relationship between attributions and academic self‐perceptions (2008)Akademik atıf tarzı: Türkiye ve İngiltere karşılaştırması (2010)Gender can be a continuous variable, not just a categorical one: Comment on Hyde, Bigler, Joel, Tate, and van Anders (2019). (2019)Do editors and referees look for signs of scientific misconduct when reviewing manuscripts? A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication (2008)Archives of scientific psychology: A new journal for a new era. (2013)How peer-review constrains cognition: on the frontline in the knowledge sector (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Problems in the Pipeline: Gender, Marriage, and Fertility in the Ivory Tower391 cited
  • 2010Testing for the Presence of Positive-Outcome Bias in Peer Review245 cited
  • 2008What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them?226 cited
  • 2002Sex Differences in Response to Evaluative Feedback: A Field Study90 cited
  • 2010If at first you don't succeed, try, try again: Understanding race, age, and gender differences in retesting score improvement.57 cited
  • 2011Gender Gaps in North American Research Productivity: Examining Faculty Publication Rates in Mexico, Canada, and the U.S.50 cited
  • 2002Individual differences in attributional style49 cited
  • 2001Editorial peer review47 cited
  • 2010Problems with peer review36 cited
  • 1994How Well Does a Journal's Peer Review Process Function?28 cited
  • 1990Peer Review Practices of Mass Communication Scholarly Journals12 cited
  • 1982Evaluating Scholarly Manuscripts in Journalism and Communications10 cited

Cited by

  • 2015How Media Scholars’ Attributes Affect Their Ratings of Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly6 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work