Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The Distinction Between Merit and Worth in Evaluation

13 references·3 citing·31 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2017The Discovery of Grounded Theory25,772 cited
1973Review of research in education7,699 cited
1966The methodology of evaluation2,484 cited
2018Utilization-Focused Evaluation2,308 cited
1979Toward a Methodology of Naturalistic Inquiry in Educational Evaluation668 cited
1979Utilization-focused evaluation.385 cited
1975Evaluating the Arts in Education: A Responsive Approach270 cited
1976Evaluating the Arts in Education, a Responsive Approach226 cited
1979The meaning of ecologically oriented inquiry in contemporary psychology.188 cited
1999Qualitative Evaluation170 cited
1987Naturalistic evaluation126 cited
1980Introduction to Illuminative Evaluation: Studies in Higher Education67 cited
1976Evaluating the Arts in Education. A Responsive Approach. Edited by Robert Stake. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill, 197555 cited

Cited by

2012The Use of Team-Based Learning as an Approach to Increased Engagement and Learning for Marketing Students58 cited
2012Stakeholder Involvement in Evaluation: Three Decades of the American Journal of Evaluation28 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2016Chinese Students’ Perceptions of the Value of Test Preparation Courses for the TOEFL iBT: Merit, Worth, and Signi cance21 cited