Article2011

Valuation and handling of dialogue in leadership

C. Grill · Gunnar Ahlborg · Eva‐Carin Lindgren

21 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Health Organization and Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies Nursing education and management Leadership and Management in Organizations

Abstract

PURPOSE: Leadership can positively affect the work environment and health. Communication and dialogue are an important part in leadership. Studies of how dialogue is valued and handled in first-line leadership have not so far been found. The aim of this study is to develop a theoretical understanding of how first-line leaders at hospitals in western Sweden value and handle dialogue in the organisation. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The study design was explorative and based on grounded theory. Data collection consisted of interviews and observations. A total of 11 first-line leaders at two hospitals in western Sweden were chosen as informants, and for four of them observation was also used. FINDINGS: One core category emerged in the analysis: leaders' communicative actions, which could be strategically or understanding-oriented, and experienced as equal or unequal and performed equitably or inequitably, within a power relationship. Four different types of communicativeactions emerged: collaborative, nurturing, controlling, and confrontational. Leaders had strategies for creating arenas and relationships for dialogue, but dialogue could be constrained by external circumstances or ignorance of the frameworks needed to conduct and accomplish dialogue. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: First-line leaders should be offered guidance in understanding the consequences of consciously choosing and strengthening the communication component in leadership. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The positive valuation of dialogue was not always manifest in practical action. One significant consequence of not using dialogue was that information with impact on organisational efficiency and finances was communicated upwards in the management system.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 21 citations exist upstream.

References

1992Basics of Qualitative Research 1990Basics of qualitative research 2014The theory of communicative action 1974The Nature of Managerial Work 1923I and Thou 1994The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook 1993On dialogue, culture, and organizational learning 2002Dialogue and the Art of Thinking Together

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.