Article1980

Measuring Change in OD Panel Designs: A Response to Critics

Robert T. Golembiewski · Keith R. Billingsley

35 citations0/0 files storedAcademy of Management Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Organizational Change and Leadership Organizational Management and Change Appreciative Inquiry and Organizational Change

Abstract

Four years ago, we reported (with Yeager) that tests utilizing survey research methods in a panel design for an organizational development (OD) project implied what we had suspected: common definitions of change are seriously inadequate. Last year, the Review published an article attacking our position [Undell & Drexler, 1979]. We respond here to their criticisms and misunderstandings.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 35 citations exist upstream.

References

1976Measuring Change and Persistence in Human Affairs: Types of Change Generated by OD Designs 1978Understanding the Measurement of Change 1979Issues in Using Survey Methods For Measuring Organizational Change

Cited by

1984Comparison of Three Techniques to Assess Group-Level Beta and Gamma Change 2002Implicit Theories and Beta Change in Longitudinal Evaluations of Training Effectiveness: An Investigation Using Item Response Theory

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.