Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Complex scientific testimony: How do jurors make decisions?

13 references·16 citing·30 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1980Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion.5,511 cited
1986Communication and Persuasion5,214 cited
2015Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change4,993 cited
1951The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness3,538 cited
1981Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion.1,933 cited
1984The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion.1,725 cited
1971The American Jury551 cited
1967The American Jury.467 cited
1983Inside the jury440 cited
1983Inside the Jury411 cited
1989Trivial persuasion in the courtroom: The power of (a few) minor details.253 cited
1963Some hedonic consequences of the confirmation and disconfirmation of expectances.213 cited
1977Juridic decisions: In ignorance of the law or in light of it?184 cited

Cited by

2001The effects of clinical and scientific expert testimony on juror decision making in capital sentencing.150 cited
2000The effects of peer review and evidence quality on judge evaluations of psychological science: Are judges effective gatekeepers?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

143 cited

2005Do jurors "know" what isn't so about child witnesses?129 cited

2008Gold versus platinum: Do jurors recognize the superiority and limitations of DNA evidence compared to other types of forensic evidence?123 cited

2001The Impact of Internal Auditor Compensation and Role on External Auditors' Planning Judgments and Decisions115 cited

2011Readers' reliance on source credibility in the service of comprehension.103 cited

2001Describing jurors' personal conceptions of insanity and their relationship to case judgments.100 cited

2000The "Hired Gun" effect: Assessing the effect of pay, frequency of testifying, and credentials on the perception of expert testimony.94 cited

2012Explanation Fiends and Foes: How Mechanistic Detail Determines Understanding and Preference89 cited

2015The Impact of Audit Evidence Documentation on Jurors' Negligence Verdicts and Damage Awards89 cited

2007The effectiveness of opposing expert witnesses for educating jurors about unreliable expert evidence.81 cited

2009Turning Mirrors Into Windows?: Assessing the Impact of (Mock) Juror Education in Rape Trials80 cited

2003Handbook of psychology in legal contexts72 cited

2003Juror decision‐making in a mock sexually violent predator trial: gender differences in the impact of divergent types of expert testimony69 cited

2004The effects of rational and experiential information processing of expert testimony in death penalty cases68 cited

2003Jurors'Evaluations of Expert Testimony: Judging the Messenger and the Message64 cited