Recycled waste? debating the analysis of worker participation: a response to Ackers et al.

Harvie Ramsay

18 citations0/0 files storedIndustrial Relations Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Labor Movements and Unions Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies Legal and Labor Studies

Abstract

Here the approach to the analysis of employee involvement proposed by Ackers et al. is challenged on several counts, and its adequacy as an alternative to the accounts it questions is contested.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 18 citations exist upstream.

References

1979Central Problems in Social Theory 1977Cycles of Control: Worker Participation in Sociological and Historical Perspective 1992The use of cycles? explaining employee involvement in the 1990s

Cited by

2009‘Riding along on the crest of a wave’: tracking the shifting rationale for non‐union consultation at FinanceCo 2000Employee Direct Participation in Britain and Australia: Evidence from AWIRS95 and WERS98 2003Consultative Employment Relations in Human Resource Management Environments with a Union Presence 2010Employee involvement in Ukrainian companies 2016Voice in a supra-organisational and shared-power world: challenges for voice in cross-sector collaboration

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.