Article1995

EVALUATING DEVELOPMENTAL ASSESSMENT CENTERS AS INTERVENTIONS

Unknown author

90 citations0/0 files storedPersonnel Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation Competency Development and Evaluation Ego Development and Educational Practices

Abstract

This study addresses the question of whether developmental assessment centers are effective interventions. Career outcomes of assessment center participants (n= 151) were evaluated with respect to center ratings, developmental activity, and acceptance of feedback. Although comparison between a subgroup of assessees (n= 113) and a naturally occurring control group of non‐assessees (n= 167) showed no differences in terms of career advancement, findings within the assessee sample did show that developmental activity related to advancement. Findings also showed that assessors' ratings of career motivation, rather than ratings of knowledge or skill (KS) dimensions, predicted both developmental activity and career advancement.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 90 citations exist upstream.

References

1993Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology 1983Advances in personality assessment 1987Meta-analysis of assessment center validity.1989Managerial lives in transition: advancing age and changing times 1987WHY DO ASSESSMENT CENTERS WORK? THE PUZZLE OF ASSESSMENT CENTER VALIDITY 1977ASSESSMENT CENTERS—VALID OR MERELY PRESCIENT1

Cited by

2003The relationship between career motivation and self-efficacy with protégé career success 2007A self‐motives perspective on feedback‐seeking behavior: Linking organizational behavior and social psychology research 1997London's Career Motivation Theory: An Update on Measurement and Research 2003The Construct-Related Validity of Assessment Center Ratings: A Review and Meta-Analysis of the Role of Methodological Factors 2007The Validity of Assessment Centres for the Prediction of Supervisory Performance Ratings: A meta‐analysis 2000Convergent and Discriminant Validity of Assessment Center Dimensions: A Conceptual and Empirical Reexamination of the Assessment Center Construct-Related Validity Paradox 2004

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.