SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Tweaking commonsense: Assessing aids to jury decision making.
10 references·3 citing·37 second hop
Tweaking commonsense: Assessing aids to jury decision making. (1997)Tweaking commonsense: Assessing aids to j…We the Jury: The Jury System and the Ideal of Democracy. (1996)We the Jury: The Jury System …The Jury: Trial and Error in the American Courtroom (1995)The Jury: Trial and Error in …Trial complexity: A field investigation of its meaning and its effects. (1994)Trial complexity: A field inv…Notetaking can aid juror recall. (1994)Notetaking can aid juror reca…Juror notetaking and question asking during trials: A national field experiment. (1994)Juror notetaking and question…Federal Rules of Evidence (1991)Federal Rules of EvidenceInstructing jurors: A field experiment with written and preliminary instructions. (1989)Instructing jurors: A field e…Increasing jurors' participation in trials: A field experiment with jury notetaking and question asking. (1988)Increasing jurors' participat…On the requirements of proof: The timing of judicial instruction and mock juror verdicts. (1979)On the requirements of proof:…Sense and Non-Sense: Jury Trial Communication (1975)Sense and Non-Sense: Jury Tri…Comparing Auditor versus Non-Auditor Assessments of Auditor Liability: An Experimental Investigation of Experts' versus Lay Evaluators' Judgments (2012)Comparing Auditor versus Non-…The cognitive effects of jury aids on decision-making in complex civil litigation (2005)The cognitive effects of jury…Commonsense justice, psychology, and the law: Prototypes that are common, senseful, and not. (1997)Commonsense justice, psycholo…Reactions of Participants and Observers to Modes of Adjudication1 (1974)Juridic decisions: In ignorance of the law or in light of it? (1977)Effects of notetaking on verdicts and evidence processing in a civil trial. (1994)A ceiling or consistency effect for the comprehension of jury instructions. (1997)REAL JURIES (2005)New York University Law Review (2017)A Theory of Psychological Reactance (1968)Juror comprehension and public policy: Perceived problems and proposed solutions. (2000)The effects of note-taking and trial transcript access on mock jury decisions in a complex civil trial. (2001)The effects of jury size, evidence complexity, and note taking on jury process and performance in a civil trial. (2002)Why People Obey the Law (2006)The American Jury. (1967)The American Jury (1971)Police interrogations and confessions: Communicating promises and threats by pragmatic implication. (1991)Coerced confessions and the jury: An experimental test of the "harmless error" rule. (1997)On the power of confession evidence: An experimental test of the fundamental difference hypothesis. (1997)Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall (1972)When prior knowledge and law collide: Helping jurors use the law. (1993)Ambiguity And Vagueness In Legal Interpretation (2012)Linguistic Human Rights (2012)Making Legal Language Understandable: A Psycholinguistic Study of Jury Instructions (1979)Judging the jury (1986)Jury Systems Around the World (2008)Jury decision‐making biases and methods to counter them (2009)The Impact of Audit Evidence Documentation on Jurors' Negligence Verdicts and Damage Awards (2015)Note taking as a generative activity. (1978)A review of note-taking: The encoding-storage paradigm and beyond (1989)Juries (1999)Procedural Justice and Relational Theory (2020)Aggregation and deliberation in valuing environmental public goods: (1998)Random Selection in Politics (1999)Committee Design with Endogenous Information (2003)Assessing the quality of evidence in empirical management accounting research: The case of survey studies (2005)Gruesome Evidence and Emotion: Anger, Blame, and Jury Decision-Making. (2006)Costs and Benefits of Eyewitness Identification Reform (2012)Lay Participation in Criminal Trials: A Comparative Perspective (1998)Discourse in the us Courtroom (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1991Federal Rules of Evidence272 cited
  • 1989Instructing jurors: A field experiment with written and preliminary instructions.136 cited
  • 1979On the requirements of proof: The timing of judicial instruction and mock juror verdicts.132 cited
  • 1994Trial complexity: A field investigation of its meaning and its effects.86 cited
  • 1996We the Jury: The Jury System and the Ideal of Democracy.75 cited
  • 1975Sense and Non-Sense: Jury Trial Communication65 cited
  • 1988Increasing jurors' participation in trials: A field experiment with jury notetaking and question asking.64 cited
  • 1994Juror notetaking and question asking during trials: A national field experiment.41 cited
  • 1994Notetaking can aid juror recall.35 cited
  • 1995The Jury: Trial and Error in the American Courtroom29 cited

Cited by

  • 2012Comparing Auditor versus Non-Auditor Assessments of Auditor Liability: An Experimental Investigation of Experts' versus Lay Evaluators' Judgments27 cited
  • 1997Commonsense justice, psychology, and the law: Prototypes that are common, senseful, and not.26 cited
  • 2005The cognitive effects of jury aids on decision-making in complex civil litigation17 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work