SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in orthodontic literature. Where do we stand?
16 references·7 citing·37 second hop
The evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in orthodontic literature. Where do we stand? (2015)The evidence from systematic reviews and …Systematic reviews published in higher impact clinical journals were of higher quality (2014)Systematic reviews published …Reporting characteristics of meta-analyses in orthodontics: methodological assessment and statistical recommendations (2013)Reporting characteristics of …Demystifying trial networks and network meta-analysis (2013)Demystifying trial networks a…Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in leading orthodontic journals: a quality paradigm? (2012)Cochrane and non-Cochrane sys…A PRISMA assessment of the reporting quality of systematic reviews in orthodontics (2012)A PRISMA assessment of the re…The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's …GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness (2011)GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating t…GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency (2011)GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating t…GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias (2011)GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating t…GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating t…GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision (2011)GRADE guidelines 6. Rating th…Evaluation of methodology and quality characteristics of systematic reviews in orthodontics (2011)Evaluation of methodology and…The assessment of systematic reviews in dentistry (2003)The assessment of systematic …Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Health Care Decisions (1998)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis…Systematic Reviews: Critical Links in the Great Chain of Evidence (1997)Systematic Reviews: Critical …Quantitative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews (1997)Quantitative Synthesis in Sys…Do statistical heterogeneity methods impact the results of meta- analyses? A meta epidemiological study (2024)Do statistical heterogeneity …Reporting, interpretation, and extrapolation issues (SPIN) in abstracts of orthodontic meta-analyses published from 2000 to 2020 (2021)Reporting, interpretation, an…Systematic reviews in orthodontics: Impact of the PRISMA for Abstracts checklist on completeness of reporting (2019)Systematic reviews in orthodo…Outcome reporting discrepancies between trial entries and published final reports of orthodontic randomized controlled trials (2018)Outcome reporting discrepanci…Heterogeneity in Cochrane and non-Cochrane meta-analyses in orthodontics (2018)Heterogeneity in Cochrane and…The use of tailored subheadings was successful in enhancing compliance with CONSORT in a dental journal (2017)The use of tailored subheadin…Risk of bias and magnitude of effect in orthodontic randomized controlled trials: a meta-epidemiological review (2015)Risk of bias and magnitude of…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. (2002)The case of the misleading funnel plot (2006)The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey (2007)External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?” (2005)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis (2014)Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis (2014)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial (2010)GetReal in network meta‐analysis: a review of the methodology (2016)Approaches to interpreting and choosing the best treatments in network meta-analyses (2017)Network meta-analysis: application and practice using Stata (2017)The Medical Review Article: State of the Science (1987)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)Recommendations for reporting randomized controlled trials of herbal interventions: explanation and elaboration (2006)Burnout in Sport: A Systematic Review (2007)Intimate Partner Violence Among Men Who Have Sex With Men (2012)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects (2008)Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews (2016)Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder (2012)GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions (2019)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,776 cited
  • 2011GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence8,270 cited
  • 2011GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision2,681 cited
  • 1997Quantitative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews2,515 cited
  • 2011GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency2,318 cited
  • 2011GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness1,838 cited
  • 2011GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias1,817 cited
  • 2013Demystifying trial networks and network meta-analysis742 cited
  • 1997Systematic Reviews: Critical Links in the Great Chain of Evidence262 cited
  • 2003The assessment of systematic reviews in dentistry121 cited
  • 2014Systematic reviews published in higher impact clinical journals were of higher quality112 cited
  • 2012A PRISMA assessment of the reporting quality of systematic reviews in orthodontics105 cited
  • 2012Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in leading orthodontic journals: a quality paradigm?95 cited
  • 1998Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Health Care Decisions93 cited
  • 2011Evaluation of methodology and quality characteristics of systematic reviews in orthodontics

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

68 cited
  • 2013Reporting characteristics of meta-analyses in orthodontics: methodological assessment and statistical recommendations51 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2018Outcome reporting discrepancies between trial entries and published final reports of orthodontic randomized controlled trials44 cited
    • 2018Heterogeneity in Cochrane and non-Cochrane meta-analyses in orthodontics43 cited
    • 2017The use of tailored subheadings was successful in enhancing compliance with CONSORT in a dental journal36 cited
    • 2015Risk of bias and magnitude of effect in orthodontic randomized controlled trials: a meta-epidemiological review35 cited
    • 2019Systematic reviews in orthodontics: Impact of the PRISMA for Abstracts checklist on completeness of reporting34 cited
    • 2021Reporting, interpretation, and extrapolation issues (SPIN) in abstracts of orthodontic meta-analyses published from 2000 to 202026 cited
    • 2024Do statistical heterogeneity methods impact the results of meta- analyses? A meta epidemiological study14 cited