SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
What a reviewer wants
14 references·1 citing·37 second hop
What a reviewer wants (2008)What a reviewer wantsStrengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)Strengthening the reporting o…The Trouble with Medical Journals (2006)The Trouble with Medical Jour…The trouble with medical journals (2006)The trouble with medical jour…How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper. (2006)How to Write and Publish a Sc…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Study design, originality and overall consistency influence acceptance or rejection of manuscripts submitted to the Journal (2004)Study design, originality and…Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate…Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate…The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Meta-analysis of Observationa…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…How to write and publish a scientific paper (1990)How to write and publish a sc…Writing Education Studies for Publication (2012)Writing Education Studies for…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement (2015)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Rules of evidence for cancer molecular-marker discovery and validation (2004)Bias as a threat to the validity of cancer molecular-marker research (2005)Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide (2011)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles (2001)Authority and invisibility (2002)Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade (2006)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)The New Statistics (2013)The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
  • 2007Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies10,709 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,702 cited
  • 2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration3,828 cited
  • 2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative3,215 cited
  • 2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative703 cited
  • 1990How to write and publish a scientific paper569 cited
  • 2006The trouble with medical journals215 cited
  • 2006The Trouble with Medical Journals168 cited
  • 2006How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper.116 cited
  • 2004Study design, originality and overall consistency influence acceptance or rejection of manuscripts submitted to the Journal

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

57 cited

Cited by

  • 2012Writing Education Studies for Publication12 cited