Market Share and Distribution: A Generalization, a Speculation, and Some Implications

David J. Reibstein · Paul Farris

157 citations0/0 files storedMarketing Science

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing Marketing and Advertising Strategies Supply Chain and Inventory Management

Abstract

In this paper we review evidence of a generalized convex cross-sectional relationship between retail distribution and unit market share, i.e., large-share brands have more share points per percentage of distribution than small-share brands. The dynamics and structure of distribution and share can help explain many phenomena in marketing, including this convex shape: (1) market share is both a cause and an effect of distribution, and (2) in the typical convenience goods distribution system there are a few large outlets that stock many brands and numerous smaller outlets that stock the leading brands only. Generally, the observed cross-sectional “curve” relating distribution and share will reflect the retailers' stocking decisions, not the incremental effect of distribution on share. However, a logically consistent model of share based on (1) and (2), when combined with the assumption of low search loyalty, results in customers being willing to switch from preferred to available brands. A further consequence is that the marginal effect of weighted distribution on share is likely to be increasing, i.e., result in convex curves relating distribution and share for a given brand. In some cases, and for some measures of distribution, these convex curves have been observed in time-series data for brands that failed and lost distribution over a relatively short period of time. The implication is that marketers should monitor distribution carefully, as it is the result of combined effects of brand preference, loyalty, and “push” programs. With a better understanding of the market share/distribution relationship, managers should be in a better position to forecast marketplace results for a given level of distribution.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 157 citations exist upstream.

References

1976A Two-Dimensional Concept of Brand Loyalty 1993Excess Behavioral Loyalty for High-Share Brands: Deviations from the Dirichlet Model for Repeat Purchasing 1979Brand Choice Inertia as One Aspect of the Notion of Brand Loyalty 1964Why Does "Brand Loyalty" Vary over Products?

Cited by

2000Building models for marketing decisions:2002First mover advantage through franchising 2008The Impact of Brand Delisting on Store Switching and Brand Switching Intentions 2013Manufacturer and Retailer Strategies to Impact Store Brand Share: Global Integration, Local Adaptation, and Worldwide Learning 2014Taking private labels upmarket: Empirical generalizations on category drivers of premium private label introductions 2011Preference Minorities and the Internet 2004Market Roll-Out and Retailer Adoption for New Brands 2002A Multimethod Approach for Creating New Business Models: The General Motors OnStar Project

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.