Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Effects of group decision rules on decisions involving continuous alternatives: The unanimity rule and extreme decisions in mock civil juries

16 references·1 citing·38 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1961EFFECTS OF GROUP PRESSURE UPON THE MODIFICATION AND DISTORTION OF JUDGMENTS2,644 cited
1981Psychology of Group Influence857 cited
1973Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes.681 cited
2015Psychology of Group Influence677 cited
2001Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups.553 cited
1983Inside the jury440 cited
1987Group decision making and normative versus informational influence: Effects of type of issue and assigned decision rule.427 cited
1980The effects of three social decision schemes on decision group process306 cited
1975The decision processes of 6- and 12-person mock juries assigned unanimous and two-thirds majority rules.212 cited
1976Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt: Effects of concept definition and assigned decision rule on the judgments of mock jurors.182 cited
2014Group Decision Making and Quantitative Judgments: A Consensus Model101 cited
1977Interactions Between Jurors as a Function of Majority vs. Unanimity Decision Rules93 cited
1996Differential Treatment of Corporate Defendants by Juries: An Examination of the “Deep-Pockets” Hypothesis72 cited
2000World Jury Systems68 cited
1982

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

The social psychology of jury deliberations: Structure, process, and product.

66 cited

1997Effects of group size and procedural influence on consensual judgments of quantity: The examples of damage awards and mock civil juries.51 cited

Cited by

2013Deliberation and Decision in Collaborative Governance: A Simulation of Approaches to Mitigate Power Imbalance149 cited