Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Design and development of a technology enhanced hybrid instruction based on MOLTA model: Its effectiveness in comparison to traditional instruction

6 references·11 citing·42 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1965Conditions of Learning3,011 cited
2013Instructional-design Theories and Models1,075 cited
1999No Significant Difference Phenomenon.698 cited
1997Web-based instruction589 cited
2001Student Attitudes toward Web-Enhanced Instruction in an Introductory Biology Course228 cited
2019Instructional Design Theory196 cited

Cited by

2019The effects of online and blended experience on outcomes in a blended learning environment115 cited
2016Comparing student performance in blended and traditional courses: Does prior academic achievement matter?113 cited
2012The impact of blended and traditional instruction in students’ performance94 cited
2017Traditional and flipped classroom approaches delivered by two different teachers: the student perspective85 cited
2013Effect of blended learning environment on transfer of learning: an experimental study82 cited
2010Comparing hybrid learning with traditional approaches on learning the Microsoft Office Power Point 2003 program in tertiary education81 cited
2016A taxonomy to define courses that mix face-to-face and online learning79 cited
2015The Hybrid Advantage: Graduate Student Perspectives of Hybrid Education Courses71 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2018

Effect of blended learning and learners’ characteristics on students’ competence: An empirical evidence in learning oriental music

66 cited

2010Determinants of interactive white board success in teaching in higher education institutions65 cited

2019Trainee Characteristics and Organizational Environment for Enhancing Individual Performance in e-Learning Involvement8 cited