SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Students’ Microscopic, Macroscopic, and Symbolic Representations of Chemical Reactions
9 references·8 citing·38 second hop
Students’ Microscopic, Macroscopic, and Symbolic Representations of Chemical Reactions (1999)Students’ Microscopic, Macroscopic, and S…Concept learning versus problem solving: There is a difference (1993)Concept learning versus probl…Are Our Students Conceptual Thinkers or Algorithmic Problem Solvers? Identifying Conceptual Students in General Chemistry (1993)Are Our Students Conceptual T…Further studies on concept learning versus problem solving (1990)Further studies on concept le…Concept learning versus problem solving: Revisited (1990)Concept learning versus probl…Understanding the particulate nature of matter (1987)Understanding the particulate…Concept learning versus problem solving: Is there a difference? (1987)Concept learning versus probl…The Generative Learning Model and its Implications for Science Education (1985)The Generative Learning Model…Student understanding of chemical equation balancing (1985)Student understanding of chem…Learning science: A generative process (1983)Learning science: A generativ…The representational levels: Influences and contributions to research in chemical education (2016)The representational levels: …Representational competence: towards a distributed and embodied cognition account (2016)Representational competence: …Supporting Knowledge Integration in Chemistry with a Visualization-Enhanced Inquiry Unit (2013)Supporting Knowledge Integrat…Students' Understanding of Chemical Formulae: A review of empirical research (2012)Students' Understanding of Ch…Effect of animation enhanced conceptual change texts on 6th grade students’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter and transformation during phase changes (2010)Effect of animation enhanced …Linking the Macroscopic and Sub-microscopic Levels: Diagrams (2009)Linking the Macroscopic and S…An Analysis of Undergraduate General Chemistry Students’ Misconceptions of the Submicroscopic Level of Precipitation Reactions (2009)An Analysis of Undergraduate …Using Static and Dynamic Visuals to Represent Chemical Change at Molecular Level (2005)Using Static and Dynamic Visu…Teachers' perceptions of important and difficult science content (1982)Translation of representations of the structure of matter and its relationship to reasoning, gender, spatial reasoning, and specific prior knowledge (1993)Effect of conceptual change approach accompanied with concept mapping on understanding of solution concepts (2005)High school students’ understanding of titrations and related acid-base phenomena (2006)The Child's Conception of Physical Causality (1932)Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics (1982)Students’ conceptions and the learning of science (1989)Reconceptalizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge (1998)Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research (2003)Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension (2017)The Journal of College Science Teaching (1971)Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena (1997)International Handbook of Science Education (1998)Language of mechanisms: exam analysis reveals students' strengths, strategies, and errors when using the electron-pushing formalism (curved arrows) in new reactions (2016)Whether and How Authentic Contexts Using a Virtual Chemistry Lab Support Learning (2018)The Complexity of Reasoning about and with Chemical Representations (2022)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Human Problem Solving (1972)Laboratory work as scientific method: three decades of confusion and distortion (1996)Constructivism in Theory and Practice: Toward a Better Understanding (2001)Student-generated questions: A meaningful aspect of learning in science (2002)THE PSYCHOLOGY OF PERSONAL CONSTRUCTS (2010)Understandings and misunderstandings of eighth graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks (1992)A cross‐age study of the understanding of five chemistry concepts (1994)A report of undergraduates' bonding misconceptions (2001)Students' Alternative Conceptions in Chemistry: A Review of Research and Implications for Teaching and Learning (1995)The effects of computer animation on the particulate mental models of college chemistry students (1995)Effectiveness of multimedia‐based instruction that emphasizes molecular representations on students' understanding of chemical change (2004)Question-posing capability as an alternative evaluation method: Analysis of an environmental case study (1999)Multidimensional analysis system for quantitative chemistry problems: Symbol, macro, micro, and process aspects (2003)Exploring How Different Features of Animations of Sodium Chloride Dissolution Affect Students’ Explanations (2007)Students' and teachers' misapplication of le chatelier's principle: Implications for the teaching of chemical equilibrium (1995)Effects of the Problem-Posing Approach on Students’ Problem Solving Skills and Metacognitive Awareness in Science Education (2018)Promoting understanding of chemical bonding and spontaneity through student explanation and integration of ideas (2002)Predicting at-risk students in general chemistry: comparing formal thought to a general achievement measure (2007)The Effects of Problem-Based Learning Instruction on University Students’ Performance of Conceptual and Quantitative Problems in Gas Concepts (2009)Addressing student misconceptions concerning electron flow in aqueous solutions with instruction including computer animations and conceptual change strategies (2000)Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Flipped Format General Chemistry Course (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1983Learning science: A generative process697 cited
  • 1987Concept learning versus problem solving: Is there a difference?400 cited
  • 1985The Generative Learning Model and its Implications for Science Education382 cited
  • 1987Understanding the particulate nature of matter305 cited
  • 1993Are Our Students Conceptual Thinkers or Algorithmic Problem Solvers? Identifying Conceptual Students in General Chemistry254 cited
  • 1993Concept learning versus problem solving: There is a difference237 cited
  • 1990Concept learning versus problem solving: Revisited221 cited
  • 1985Student understanding of chemical equation balancing154 cited
  • 1990Further studies on concept learning versus problem solving146 cited

Cited by

  • 2012Students' Understanding of Chemical Formulae: A review of empirical research90 cited
  • 2009Linking the Macroscopic and Sub-microscopic Levels: Diagrams89 cited
  • 2016Representational competence: towards a distributed and embodied cognition account85 cited
  • 2005Using Static and Dynamic Visuals to Represent Chemical Change at Molecular Level77 cited
  • 2010Effect of animation enhanced conceptual change texts on 6th grade students’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter and transformation during phase changes72 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2016The representational levels: Influences and contributions to research in chemical education70 cited
  • 2013Supporting Knowledge Integration in Chemistry with a Visualization-Enhanced Inquiry Unit69 cited
  • 2009An Analysis of Undergraduate General Chemistry Students’ Misconceptions of the Submicroscopic Level of Precipitation Reactions68 cited