Dyadic Goal Setting and Role Stress: A Field Study

James Campbell Quick

37 citations0/0 files storedAcademy of Management Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior Employee Performance and Management Team Dynamics and Performance

Abstract

A field study was conducted over a 14 month period to examine goal setting as a dyadic, role making process between 46 managerial and staff employees (subordinates) and 15 officers and directors (s...

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 37 citations exist upstream.

References

1963Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research 1970Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex Organizations 1965Organizational Stress: Studies in Role Conflict and Ambiguity.1968Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives 1972Role conflict and ambiguity as critical variables in a model of organizational behavior 1975A Review of Research on the Application of Goal Setting in Organizations 1968Motivational effects of knowledge of results: A goal-setting phenomenon?1974The role of task-goal attributes in employee performance.

Cited by

1987Effects of exercise, relaxation, and management skills training on physiological stress indicators: A field experiment.1991Eight Myths on Motivating Social Services Workers:

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.