Citation map · Study

National Student Survey: are differences between universities and courses reliable and meaningful?

16 references·5 citing·38 second hop

this work references cited by second hop

References

2000Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions4,907 cited
2000Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis.3,573 cited
1987Students' evaluations of University teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research1,330 cited
1984Students' evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential baises, and utility.1,017 cited
1997Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility.884 cited
1997Student ratings: The validity of use.534 cited
1982SEEQ: A RELIABLE, VALID, AND USEFUL INSTRUMENT FOR COLLECTING STUDENTS' EVALUATIONS OF UNIVERSITY TEACHING524 cited
1997Navigating student ratings of instruction.457 cited
2007Students’ Evaluations of University Teaching: Dimensionality, Reliability, Validity, Potential Biases and Usefulness397 cited
1980Effectiveness of student-rating feedback for improving college instruction: A meta-analysis of findings372 cited
2007Identifying Exemplary Teachers and Teaching: Evidence from Student Ratings1349 cited
1990An afterword for ?the association between student ratings of specific instructional dimensions and student achievement: Refining and extending the synthesis of data from multisection validity studies?316 cited
1989The association between student ratings of specific instructional dimensions and student achievement: Refining and extending the synthesis of data from multisection validity studies

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

References

Cited by