SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Peer review as a business transaction
1 references·6 citing·28 second hop
Peer review as a business transaction (2015)Peer review as a business transactionOpen access is tiring out peer reviewers (2014)Open access is tiring out pee…Paying reviewers and regulating the number of papers may help fix the peer-review process (2025)Paying reviewers and regulati…Towards peer review as a group engagement (2022)Towards peer review as a grou…Rate of publication in predatory journals by orthopedic surgeons members of the French orthopedic and traumatology society (SOFCOT): A follow-up note (2020)Rate of publication in predat…Retaining and Rewarding Journal Peer Reviewers (2018)Retaining and Rewarding Journ…The current peer review system is unsustainable-awaken the paid reviewer force! (2017)The current peer review syste…The Clarivate TM Analytics acquisition of Publons – an evolution or commodification of peer review? (2017)The Clarivate TM Analytics ac…Guarding the Guardians: A Conference on Editorial Peer Review (1986)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Problems with Traditional Science Publishing and Finding a Wider Niche for Post-Publication Peer Review (2014)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise (2016)It’s Time We Fix the Peer Review System (2018)Are negative reviews, predatory reviewers or failed peer review rewarded at Publons? (2020)Rewarding Peer Reviewers - Maintaining the Integrity of Science Communication (2015)Rewarding peer‐review work: the Publons initiative (2016)Core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals: consensus statement (2017)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison (2017)Predatory Publishing in Orthopaedic Research (2018)Predatory Journals in Orthopaedic Surgery (2023)Research on Predatory Publishing in Health Care: A Scoping Review (2023)An overview of studies assessing predatory journals within the biomedical sciences (2025)Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. (1971)A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. (1999)Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions (2000)Peer review: the attitudes and behaviours of Covid-19 pandemic-era early career researchers (2023)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index (2010)Predatory journals: no definition, no defence (2019)Do you want your paper published? – Then referee others! The view from seasoned editors (2024)Complex systems approach to scientific publication and peer-review system: development of an agent-based model calibrated with empirical journal data (2015)Review time in peer review: quantitative analysis and modelling of editorial workflows (2016)Enhancing peer review efficiency: A mixed‐methods analysis of artificial intelligence ‐assisted reviewer selection across academic disciplines (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2014Open access is tiring out peer reviewers56 cited

Cited by

  • 2017The Clarivate TM Analytics acquisition of Publons – an evolution or commodification of peer review?22 cited
  • 2020Rate of publication in predatory journals by orthopedic surgeons members of the French orthopedic and traumatology society (SOFCOT): A follow-up note19 cited
  • 2017The current peer review system is unsustainable-awaken the paid reviewer force!14 cited
  • 2022Towards peer review as a group engagement10 cited
  • 2025Paying reviewers and regulating the number of papers may help fix the peer-review process9 cited
  • 2018Retaining and Rewarding Journal Peer Reviewers9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work