SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Milestones on the long road to knowledge
0 references·4 citing·18 second hop
Milestones on the long road to knowledge (2007)Milestones on the long road to knowledgeSystematic review and meta-analysis: Which pitfalls to avoid during this process (2021)Systematic review and meta-an…Evidence-Based Policymaking: Promise, Challenges and Opportunities for Accounting and Financial Markets Research (2018)Evidence-Based Policymaking: …Reporting the level of evidence in the Canadian Journal of Plastic Surgery: Why is it important? (2012)Reporting the level of eviden…Quality of Clinical Studies in Aesthetic Surgery Journals: A 10-Year Review (2009)Quality of Clinical Studies i…Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions (2002)Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials (2003)Quality of clinical studies in neurosurgical journals: signs of improvement over three decades (2005)Quality of reporting according to the CONSORT, STROBE and Timmer instrument at the American Burn Association (ABA) annual meetings 2000 and 2008 (2011)How to avoid common errors in writing scientific manuscripts (2018)The 100 Most-cited Articles in Abdominoplasty: A Bibliometric Analysis (2021)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Acting in the public interest: accounting for the vulnerable (2020)Copycat Skills and Disclosure Costs: Evidence from Peer Companies’ Digital Footprints (2021)Bankruptcy in groups (2023)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews (2014)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2018Evidence-Based Policymaking: Promise, Challenges and Opportunities for Accounting and Financial Markets Research72 cited
  • 2009Quality of Clinical Studies in Aesthetic Surgery Journals: A 10-Year Review36 cited
  • 2012Reporting the level of evidence in the Canadian Journal of Plastic Surgery: Why is it important?13 cited
  • 2021Systematic review and meta-analysis: Which pitfalls to avoid during this process9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work