The theory of contracts and labor practices in Japan and the United States

Abstract

Abstract Labor management practices in Japan are quite different from those in the United States. We begin with the assumption that markets are incomplete, and use recent developments in contract theory to develop a conceptual framework to understand why the differences have been maintained. Our basic message will be that the American and Japanese systems are examples of two different equilibria. The distinguishing feature of these two equilibria will be the extent to which exit is used as a method of contract enforcement. In the United States there is a greater tendency for the use of exit because active markets exist for senior workers. In contrast, there is virtually no market for mid‐career workers in Japan. We also discuss the implications of this fundamental difference for the structure of the internal and external labor markets.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 20 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.