Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Rational Disagreement in Peer Review

0 references·16 citing·54 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

2008Validating research performance metrics against peer rankings96 cited
2009Peer review of grant applications in biology and medicine. Reliability, fairness, and validity77 cited
1995The postgutenberg galaxy: How to get there from here70 cited
2003Quality control in scholarly publishing: A new proposal65 cited
2013Assessing non-standard article impact using F1000 labels64 cited
1996Cognitive Technology - In Search of a Humane Interface62 cited
1991Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review55 cited
1996Research on research evaluation48 cited
1992Interactive Publication: Extending the American Physical Society's Discipline-Specific Model for Electronic Publishing46 cited
2007Peer review for the evaluation of academic research: lessons from the Italian experience46 cited
1997The Paper House of Cards (And Why It's Taking So Long to Collapse)44 cited
2008Peer Review Anew: Three Principles and a Case Study in Postpublication Quality Assurance40 cited
1991The Predictive Ability of Peer Review of Grant Proposals: The Case of Ecology and the US National Science Foundation39 cited
2022Peer review in an Era of Evaluation

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

29 cited

1997How to Fast-Forward Learned Serials to the Inevitable and the Optimal for Scholars and Scientists21 cited

1997All Or None: No Stable Hybrid or Half-Way Solutions for Launching the Learned Periodical Literature into the PostGutenberg Galaxy20 cited