DEFINING SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN WORKPLACES: A POLICY-CAPTURING APPROACH.

Kenneth M. York

96 citations0/0 files storedAcademy of Management Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Workplace Violence and Bullying Discrimination and Equality Law Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies

Abstract

In this study, college and university equal employment opportunity officers and university students judged 80 incidents of possible sexual harassment. They were asked if the incidents were cases of sexual harassment and if they would advise that EEOC charges be filed. The subjects were moderately consistent in their judgments and made similar decisions for both questions, weighting three aspects of the incidents most heavily: evidence of coercion, the victim's reaction, and job consequences.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 96 citations exist upstream.

References

1955Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology.1969Analyzing the expert judge: A descriptive study of a stockbroker's decision process.1982Sexual Harassment on a University Campus: The Confluence of Authority Relations, Sexual Interest and Gender Stratification 1978Livestock judges: How much information can an expert use?1982Sexual Assault and Harassment: A Campus Community Case Study 1972Analyzing the Use of Information in Investment Decision Making: A Methodological Proposal 1981Sexual harassment . . . some see it . . . some won't.1980Sexuality and the Workplace

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.