No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
The authors investigated effects of metacognitive instruction at different phases of reading scientific texts on elementary school students' scientific literacy and metacognitive awareness. In all, 108 Israeli 4th-grade students in 4 science classrooms read the same scientific texts and completed the same scientific tasks. From them, 3 treatment groups received metacognitive instruction—before reading (beMETA), during reading (duMETA), or after reading (afMETA)—and a control group received none (noMETA). Pre- and posttests assessed students' science literacy, domainspecific knowledge, and metacognitive awareness. Findings indicated no significant intergroup pretest differences but significant posttest differences on all variables. AfMETA students significantly outperformed all other groups, beMETA outperformed duMETA, and noMETA scored lowest. The authors discuss theoretical and practical implications of this preliminary study.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 86 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.