A META‐ANALYSIS OF CONDITIONAL REASONING TESTS OF AGGRESSION

Christopher M. Berry · Paul R. Sackett · Vanessa Tobares

55 citations0/0 files storedPersonnel Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychological Testing and Assessment Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Workplace Violence and Bullying

Abstract

James et al. (2005) reported an estimate of criterion‐related validity (corrected only for dichotomization of criteria) of r = .44 across 11 conditional reasoning test of aggression (CRT‐Aggression) validity studies. This meta‐analysis incorporated a total sample size more than twice that of James et al. Our comparable validity estimate for CRT‐Aggression scales predicting counterproductive work behaviors was r = .16. Validity for the current, commercially marketed test version (CRT‐A) was lower ( r = .10). These validity estimates increased somewhat (into the .24–.26 range) if studies using dichotomous criteria with low base rates were excluded from the meta‐analysis. CRT‐Aggression scales were correlated r = .14 with measures of job performance. As we differed with James et al. in some of our coding decisions, we reran all analyses using James et al.'s coding decisions and arrived at extremely similar results.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 55 citations exist upstream.

References

2015Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings 2004Methods of Meta-Analysis 1991Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings.1995Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population.2005The dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal?2007Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis.1993Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance.1982Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences.

Cited by

2013Personality and Cognitive Ability as Predictors of Effective Performance at Work 2014Evidence-Based Management and the Trustworthiness of Our Cumulative Scientific Knowledge: Implications for Teaching, Research, and Practice 2011Emotional intelligence: A promise unfulfilled?2012A Review of Citizenship and Counterproductive Behaviors in Organizational Decision-Making 2020

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.