SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

ESL students’ experiences of online peer feedback · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleESL students’ experiences of online peer feedback

Martin Guardado2007

Article2007

ESL students’ experiences of online peer feedback

Martin Guardado · Ling Shi

229 citations·0/0 files stored·Computers & composition/Computers and composition

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning Student Assessment and Feedback English Language Learning and Teaching

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 229 citations exist upstream.

References

1991Grounding in communication.1991Perspectives on socially shared cognition.1996A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: A computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom 2002Peer Response in Second Language Writing Classrooms 2003The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing 2004The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course

Cited by

2016Exploring the value of peer feedback in online learning for the provider 2018Written corrective feedback from sociocultural theoretical perspectives: A research agenda 2011Using technology to encourage student engagement with feedback: a literature review 2018Synchronous and asynchronous teacher electronic feedback and learner uptake in ESL composition 2017Synchronous web-based collaborative writing: Factors mediating interaction among second-language writers 2019Exploring online peer feedback and automated corrective feedback on EFL writing performance 2017Anonymous versus identified peer assessment via a Facebook-based learning application: Effects on quality of peer feedback, perceived learning, perceived fairness, and attitude toward the system

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2014Technology-supported peer feedback in ESL/EFL writing classes: a research synthesisarticle · 4 shared references 2016Two Decades of Research in L2 Peer Reviewarticle · 4 shared references 2016Peer Feedback in Second Language Writingarticle · 3 shared references 2009Issues of cultural appropriateness and pedagogical efficacy: exploring peer review in a second language writing classarticle · 3 shared references 2011THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FEEDBACK FOR L1‐ENGLISH AND L2‐WRITING DEVELOPMENT: A META‐ANALYSISarticle · 3 shared references 2012Effects of Peer E-Feedback on Turkish EFL Students' Writing Performancearticle · 3 shared references

Details

Year2007

Typearticle

Published2007-01-01

VenueComputers & composition/Computers and composition

ISSN-L1873-2011

Languageen

Citations229

Files0 public / 0

ShelfEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.compcom.2007.03.002

openalex_workW2051995782

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2012Effects of Peer E-Feedback on Turkish EFL Students' Writing Performance