Two Decades of Research in L2 Peer Review

Carrie Yea-huey Chang

95 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Writing Research

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning Student Assessment and Feedback Second Language Acquisition and Learning

Abstract

One hundred and three (N=103) peer review studies contextualized in L2 composition classrooms and published between 1990 and 2015 were reviewed. To categorize constructs in research studies, this researcher used Lai’s (2010) three Ps dimensions (perceptions, process, and product). Perceptions are the beliefs and attitudes of peer review. Process refers to the learning process or implementation procedures of peer review. Product is the learning outcomes of peer review. A thematic analysis of the studies’ constructs showed that perception studies examined learners’ general perceptions/attitudes, Asian students’ perceptions/attitudes (cultural influences), and learner perceptions of peer feedback in comparison to self and/or computerized feedback. Process studies discussed the effects of training, checklists/rubrics, writer-reviewer relationships, the nature of peer feedback, communicative language, timing of teacher feedback on peer feedback, grouping strategies, as well as communicative medium. Product research, on the other hand, investigated peer feedback adoption rates and ratio of peer-influenced revisions, effects of peer review on writers’ revision quality, effects of peer review on reviewers’ gains, and effects of peer review on writers’ self revision. In light of this review, research gaps are identified and suggestions for future research are offered.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 95 citations exist upstream.

References

1978Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes 1999Handbook of qualitative research 2006Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment 2006Feedback on second language students' writing 2008To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing 2006A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class 2000Do Secondary L2 Writers Benefit from Peer Comments?2004Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class

Cited by

2019Investigating the Operating Mechanisms of the Sources of L2 Writing Self‐Efficacy at the Stages of Giving and Receiving Peer Feedback 2018The alignment of written peer feedback with draft problems and its impact on revision in peer assessment 2023EFL student engagement with giving peer feedback in academic writing: A longitudinal study 2021Computer-mediated and face-to-face peer feedback: student feedback and revision in EFL writing 2019Metacognitive Instruction for Peer Review Interaction in L2 Writing

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.