SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Contexts and Issues in Feedback on L2 Writing · Study

ChapterShelves

ChapterContexts and Issues in Feedback on L2 Writing

Ken Hyland2019

Chapter2019

Contexts and Issues in Feedback on L2 Writing

108 citations·0/0 files stored·Cambridge University Press eBooks

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning Student Assessment and Feedback Second Language Acquisition and Learning

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 108 citations exist upstream.

References

2004School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence 2012Handbook of Research on Student Engagement 1996The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes 2012Developmental Dynamics of Student Engagement, Coping, and Everyday Resilience 2003The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing 2006Differing perceptions in the feedback process 2008To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing 1985Responding to Student Writing

Cited by

2025Comparing the effects of ChatGPT and automated writing evaluation on students’ writing and ideal L2 writing self 2024L2 writer engagement with automated written corrective feedback provided by ChatGPT: A mixed-method multiple case study 2014Implementing assessment for learning in L2 writing: An activity theory perspective 2020Second language writing instructors’ feedback practice in response to automated writing evaluation: A sociocultural perspective 2020The impact of L2 writing instructional approaches on student writing motivation and engagement

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2011THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FEEDBACK FOR L1‐ENGLISH AND L2‐WRITING DEVELOPMENT: A META‐ANALYSISarticle · 31 shared references 2015Written corrective feedback at a Saudi University : English language teachers’ beliefs, students’ preferences, and teachers’ practicesthesis · 24 shared references 2016Two Decades of Research in L2 Peer Reviewarticle · 21 shared references 2009Issues of cultural appropriateness and pedagogical efficacy: exploring peer review in a second language writing classarticle · 19 shared references 2010The Effects of Integrating Peer Feedback into University-Level ESL Writing Curriculum: A Comparative Study in a Saudi Contextthesis · 19 shared references 2015Bringing innovation to conventional feedback approaches in EFL secondary writing classroomsarticle · 19 shared references

Details

Year2019

Typechapter

Published2019-07-04

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks

Languageen

Citations108

Files0 public / 0

ShelfEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

Identifiers

doi10.1017/9781108635547.003

openalex_workW272857783

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2015The effects of face-to-face and computer-mediated peer review on EFL writers’ comments and revisions

2020Less is more? The impact of written corrective feedback on corpus-assisted L2 error resolution

2022Profiles of Chinese secondary students’ L2 writing motivation and engagement