SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Objective and Subjective Comprehension of Jury Instructions in Criminal Trials
12 references·4 citing·40 second hop
Objective and Subjective Comprehension of Jury Instructions in Criminal Trials (2014)Objective and Subjective Comprehension of…Behind closed doors: the effect of pretrial publicity on jury deliberations (2011)Behind closed doors: the effe…Juror Understanding of Judicial Instructions in Criminal Trials (2008)Juror Understanding of Judici…Bringing Jury Instructions Into the Twenty-First Century (2006)Bringing Jury Instructions In…Evaluating the comprehensibility of jury instructions: A method and an example. (2001)Evaluating the comprehensibil…A comparison of insanity defense standards on juror decision making. (1991)A comparison of insanity defe…Are Twelve Heads Better than One? (1989)Are Twelve Heads Better than …The Psychology of Evidence and Trial Procedure (1985)The Psychology of Evidence an…Toward Criminal Jury Instructions That Jurors Can Understand (1984)Toward Criminal Jury Instruct…Improving the Ability of Jurors to Comprehend and Apply Criminal Jury Instructions (1982)Improving the Ability of Juro…Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. (1980)Heuristic versus systematic i…Making Legal Language Understandable: A Psycholinguistic Study of Jury Instructions (1979)Making Legal Language Underst…Personality and Attitude Change: An Information-Processing Theory (1968)Personality and Attitude Chan…Psychological insights for judging expertise and implications for adversarial legal contexts (2025)Psychological insights for ju…Supporting Jury Understanding of Expert Evidence in a Virtual Environment (2022)Supporting Jury Understanding…Performing Expertise: The Design of Audiovisual Links and the Construction of the Remote Expert Witness in Court (2018)Performing Expertise: The Des…Intoxicated But Not Incapacitated: Are There Effective Methods to Assist Juries in Interpreting Evidence of Voluntary Complainant Intoxication in Cases of Rape? (2018)Intoxicated But Not Incapacit…North Carolina Law Review (1927)Behavioral sciences and the law. (1966)Criminal Justice and Behavior (1980)"Empirical research on the insanity defense and attempted reforms: Evidence toward informed policy": Erratum. (1999)Socioeconomic Stratification and Mental Disorder (2009)Labeling and Stigma (2012)Self-Perception Theory (1972)Script processing in attitude formation and decision making. (1976)The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion (1986)A Continuum of Impression Formation, from Category-Based to Individuating Processes: Influences of Information and Motivation on Attention and Interpretation (1990)Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). (1995)Cognition and Social Behavior (2014)Juridic decisions: In ignorance of the law or in light of it? (1977)Prototypes in the courtroom: Lay representations of legal concepts. (1991)International approaches to rape (2011)Endeavours towards a plain legal language: The case of Spanish in context (2018)Conflict, Decision and Dissonance (1965)The eyewitness, the expert psychologist, and the jury. (1989)When prior knowledge and law collide: Helping jurors use the law. (1993)Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. (1956)The Handbook of Social Psychology (1969)What doesn't kill me makes me stronger: The effects of resisting persuasion on attitude certainty. (2002)The Sleeper Effect in Persuasion: A Meta-Analytic Review. (2004)Understanding attitudes toward affirmative action programs in employment: Summary and meta-analysis of 35 years of research. (2006)Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (2008)Discourse in the us Courtroom (2012)Fifty Years of Multilingual Interpretation in the European Union (2012)Linguistic Human Rights (2012)Blindfolding the Jury to Verdict Consequences: Damages, Experts, and the Civil Jury (1992)What social science teaches us about the jury instruction process. (1997)What do we know about rape myths and juror decision making? (2020)Language in the Legal Process (1980)Linguistic and socioemotional influences on the accuracy of children's reports. (1996)Linguistic Complexity in Firm Disclosures: Obfuscation or Information? (2014)Judge's Instruction on Eyewitness Testimony: Evaluation and Revision1 (1988)Instructing on death: Psychologists, juries, and judges. (1993)Comprehensibility of approved jury instructions in capital murder cases. (1995)Children and adults as intuitive scientists. (1989)Encyclopedia of sociology (1992)CURRENT RESEARCH IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (1996)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1980Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion.5,511 cited
  • 1968Personality and Attitude Change: An Information-Processing Theory416 cited
  • 1979Making Legal Language Understandable: A Psycholinguistic Study of Jury Instructions376 cited
  • 1985The Psychology of Evidence and Trial Procedure278 cited
  • 1989Are Twelve Heads Better than One?129 cited
  • 1982Improving the Ability of Jurors to Comprehend and Apply Criminal Jury Instructions121 cited
  • 1991A comparison of insanity defense standards on juror decision making.94 cited
  • 1984Toward Criminal Jury Instructions That Jurors Can Understand84 cited
  • 2006Bringing Jury Instructions Into the Twenty-First Century67 cited
  • 2008Juror Understanding of Judicial Instructions in Criminal Trials66 cited
  • 2001Evaluating the comprehensibility of jury instructions: A method and an example.65 cited
  • 2011Behind closed doors: the effect of pretrial publicity on jury deliberations54 cited

Cited by

  • 2018Intoxicated But Not Incapacitated: Are There Effective Methods to Assist Juries in Interpreting Evidence of Voluntary Complainant Intoxication in Cases of Rape?20 cited
  • 2018Performing Expertise: The Design of Audiovisual Links and the Construction of the Remote Expert Witness in Court

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

14 cited
  • 2022Supporting Jury Understanding of Expert Evidence in a Virtual Environment10 cited
  • 2025Psychological insights for judging expertise and implications for adversarial legal contexts4 cited