Do you see what we see? The complex effects of perceptual distance between leaders and teams.

Cristina B. Gibson · Cecily D. Cooper · Jay A. Conger

142 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Applied Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Team Dynamics and Performance Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior Conflict Management and Negotiation

Abstract

Previous distance-related theories and concepts (e.g., social distance) have failed to address the sometimes wide disparity in perceptions between leaders and the teams they lead. Drawing from the extensive literature on teams, leadership, and cognitive models of social information processing, the authors develop the concept of leader-team perceptual distance, defined as differences between a leader and a team in perceptions of the same social stimulus. The authors investigate the effects of perceptual distance on team performance, operationalizing the construct with 3 distinct foci: goal accomplishment, constructive conflict, and decision-making autonomy. Analyzing leader, member, and customer survey responses for a large sample of teams, the authors demonstrate that perceptual distance between a leader and a team regarding goal accomplishment and constructive conflict have a nonlinear relationship with team performance. Greater perceptual differences are associated with decreases in team performance. Moreover, this effect is strongest when a team's perceptions are more positive than the leader's are (as opposed to the reverse). This pattern illustrates the pervasive effects that perceptions can have on team performance, highlighting the importance of developing awareness of perceptions in order to increase effectiveness. Implications for theory and practice are delineated. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved).

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 142 citations exist upstream.

References

1999Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives 1992Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit 1999Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams 1984Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers 1995Testing Structural Equation Models.1989LISREL 7 : user's reference guide 2000Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions 1991A Theory of Goal Setting and Task PerformanceA Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance, by LockeEdwin A. and LathamGary P.. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1990.

Cited by

2011When managers and their teams disagree: A longitudinal look at the consequences of differences in perceptions of organizational support.2015Are we on the same page? The performance effects of congruence between supervisor and group trust.2012Team Role Stress 2019Leadership, organizational culture, and innovative behavior in construction projects 2013Advancing Our Understanding of Team Motivation

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.