Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Effects of lawyers' socio-political attitudes on their judgments of social science in legal decision making.

16 references·16 citing·37 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1975Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases22,647 cited
2017A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance18,122 cited
1982Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method.6,852 cited
1984Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.5,656 cited
2013Choices, Values, and Frames5,320 cited
1979Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence.4,582 cited
1983Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment.4,196 cited
1991Toward a general theory of expertise : prospects and limits1,766 cited
1977Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system1,013 cited
1989Effects of involvement on persuasion: A meta-analysis.986 cited
1986Recent Research on Selective Exposure to Information820 cited
1954They saw a game: a case study.562 cited
2004The Origins and Meaning of Liberal/Conservative Self-Identifications539 cited
1978Scientist as Subject: The Psychological Imperative.412 cited
1984The prediction of violent behavior: toward a second generation of theory and policy384 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1960The new organon and related writings344 cited

Cited by

2004The construction and interpretation of vignettes in social research413 cited
2012The construction and interpretation of vignettes in social research147 cited
2001Sociopolitical diversity in psychology: The case for pluralism.108 cited
2001What judges and lawyers think about the testimony of mental health experts: a survey of the courts and bar72 cited
2006Public attitudes about the culpability and punishment of young offenders56 cited
2006Strong Corporate Governance and Audit Firm Rotation: Effects on Judges' Independence Perceptions and Litigation Judgments55 cited
2007Do a law's policy implications affect beliefs about its constitutionality? An experimental test.52 cited
2002Assessment of the commonsense psychology underlying Daubert: Legal decision makers' abilities to evaluate expert evidence in hostile work environment cases.46 cited
2013Motivated Cognition in Legal Judgments—An Analytic Review39 cited
20105 Judges as Members of Small Groups36 cited
20107 Is There a Psychology of Judging?36 cited
2012Legal Reasoning32 cited
2016If you judge, investigate! Responsibility reduces confirmatory information processing in legal experts.30 cited
20101 Motivation and Judicial Behavior: Expanding the Scope of Inquiry29 cited
2024Can Law Students Replace Judges in Experiments of Judicial Decision-Making?24 cited
2019Should digital files be considered a commons? Copyright infringement in the eyes of lawyers24 cited