Article2002

Examining the Effects of Different Multiple Representational Systems in Learning Primary Mathematics

Shaaron Elizabeth Ainsworth · Peter A. Bibby

275 citations0/0 files storedJournal of the Learning Sciences

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills

Abstract

Multi-representational learning environments are now commonplace in schools and homes. Research that has evaluated the effectiveness of such environments shows that learners can benefit from multiple representations once they have mastered a number of complex tasks. One of the key tasks for learning with multiple representations is successful translation between representations. In order to explore the factors that influence learners' translation between representations, this article presents 2 experiments with a multi-representational environment where the difficulty of translating between representations was manipulated. Pairs of pictorial, mathematical, or mixed pictorial and mathematical representations were used to teach children in 1 of 3 experimental conditions aspects of computational estimation. In Experiment 1, all children learned to become more accurate estimators. Children in the pictorial and the mathematical conditions improved in their ability to judge the accuracy of their estimates, but children in the mixed condition did not. Experiment 2 explored if the mixed condition's difficulties with translation were temporary by requiring additional time to be spent on the system. It was found that children in all the experimental conditions improved in their judgments of estimation accuracy. It is argued that the mixed condition's failure to improve in Experiment 1 was due to the difficulties they experienced in translating information between disparate types of representation. Their success in Experiment 2 was explained not by learning to translate between representations, but through the adoption of a single representation that contained all the necessary information. This strategy was only effective because of the way that information was distributed across representations.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 275 citations exist upstream.

References

1988Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning 1981Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices*2024Cognition and Categorization 1994For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning.1999The functions of multiple representations 1992The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning.1992THE SPLIT‐ATTENTION EFFECT AS A FACTOR IN THE DESIGN OF INSTRUCTION 2012Cognitive Flexibility and Hypertext: Theory and Technology for the Nonlinear and Multidimensional Traversal of Complex Subject Matter

Cited by

2004The active integration of information during learning with dynamic and interactive visualisations 2008Assisting self-explanation prompts are more effective than open prompts when learning with multiple representations 2009Instructional aids to support a conceptual understanding of multiple representations.2005The Self-Explanation Principle in Multimedia Learning 2014An Integrative Framework for the Analysis of Multiple and Multimodal Representations for Meaning‐Making in Science Education

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.