Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

I don't think that's what really happened: The effect of cross-examination on the accuracy of children's reports.

11 references·15 citing·44 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1992Testifying in Criminal Court: Emotional Effects on Child Sexual Assault Victims420 cited
1995Interviewing Preschoolers: Effects of Nonsuggestive Techniques, Parental Coaching, and Leading Questions on Reports of Nonexperienced Events293 cited
1991Effects of participation on children's reports: Implications for children's testimony.224 cited
1990Children's Use of Anatomically Detailed Dolls to Recount an Event224 cited
1993Child victims, child witnesses: Understanding and improving testimony.186 cited
1998Face-to-face confrontation: Effects of closed-circuit technology on children's eyewitness testimony and jurors' decisions.183 cited
2002Effects of social support on children's eyewitness reports: A test of the underlying mechanism.144 cited
2003Asked and Answered: Questioning Children in the Courtroom143 cited
2002The Experiences of Child Complainants of Sexual Abuse in the Criminal Justice System62 cited
1997In reply to: The interests of justice? The cross‐examination of child complainants of sexual abuse in criminal proceedings42 cited
2002Persuading and Controlling: The Theory of Cross‐Examination in Relation to Children39 cited

Cited by

2015Developing Rapport with Children in Forensic Interviews: Systematic Review of Experimental Research118 cited
2009Cross-Examination of Sexual Assault Complainants: A Developmental Comparison

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

98 cited

2012Disorder in the courtroom? Child witnesses under cross-examination82 cited

2014Question Types, Responsiveness and Self‐contradictions when Prosecutors and Defense Attorneys Question Alleged Victims of Child Sexual Abuse80 cited

2005The negative effect of cross-examination style questioning on children's accuracy: older children are not immune74 cited

2014Attorneys' Questions and Children's Productivity in Child Sexual Abuse Criminal Trials68 cited

2012Current Topics in Children's Learning and Cognition64 cited

2010When Do Children Exhibit a “Yes” Bias?59 cited

2015‘A very valuable tool’28 cited

2012Questioning Child Witnesses: Exploring the Benefits and Risks of Intermediary Models in New Zealand26 cited

2017The Nordic Model of Handling Children’s Testimonies22 cited

2017The “Good Old Days” of Courtroom Questioning: Changes in the Format of Child Cross-Examination Questions Over 60 Years20 cited

2020Cross-Examination in Sexual Assault Trials: Evidentiary Safeguard or an Opportunity to Confuse?18 cited

2013Prediction of Jury Verdicts in Child Sexual Assault Trials16 cited

2018Does implementation of reforms authorized in Section 28 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act affect the complexity of the questions asked of young alleged victims in court?14 cited