Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Trustworthiness and authority of scholarly information in a digital age: Results of an international questionnaire

16 references·16 citing·41 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1995An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust15,026 cited
1995An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust10,705 cited
2001What Trust Means in E-Commerce Customer Relationships: An Interdisciplinary Conceptual Typology2,278 cited
2012Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling2,240 cited
2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data1,909 cited
2003On-line trust: concepts, evolving themes, a model1,200 cited
2005Scientists behaving badly1,089 cited
2013Credibility and trust of information in online environments: The use of cognitive heuristics996 cited
2012Predatory publishers are corrupting open access956 cited
2013Who's Afraid of Peer Review?934 cited
2003Empirical research in on-line trust: a review and critical assessment827 cited
2006Data Quality : Concepts, Methodologies and Techniques662 cited
2006Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions407 cited
2011Retracted Science and the Retraction Index405 cited
2012A study of open access journals using article processing charges

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

358 cited

2011Social media use in the research workflow344 cited

Cited by

2020Credibility of preprints: an interdisciplinary survey of researchers83 cited
2017Early career researchers: Scholarly behaviour and the prospect of change82 cited
2020A global questionnaire survey of the scholarly communication attitudes and behaviours of early career researchers64 cited
2015Changes in the digital scholarly environment and issues of trust: An exploratory, qualitative analysis40 cited
2020The changed – and changing – landscape of serials publishing: Review of the literature on emerging models39 cited
2022Caution, Preprint! Brief Explanations Allow Nonscientists to Differentiate Between Preprints and Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles38 cited
2019Scholarly reputation building in the digital age: an activity-specific approach. Review article38 cited
2018Researchers’ online visibility: tensions of visibility, trust and reputation35 cited
2021Genres and languages in science communication: The multiple dimensions of the science-policy interface34 cited
2017Academics’ attitudes towards peer review in scholarly journals and the effect of role and discipline31 cited
2021Toward Open Research: A Narrative Review of the Challenges and Opportunities for Open Humanities31 cited
2020How is open access publishing going down with early career researchers? An international, multi-disciplinary study27 cited
2019Does the scholarly communication system satisfy the beliefs and aspirations of new researchers? Summarizing the Harbingers research24 cited
2021Conjoint analysis of researchers' hidden preferences for bibliometrics, altmetrics, and usage metrics24 cited
2019Academics and the Field of Academic Publishing: Challenges and Approaches21 cited
2018Scholarly reputation21 cited