Selection and Training Procedures of U.S., European, and Japanese Multinationals

Rosalie L. Tung

615 citations0/0 files storedCalifornia Management Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

International Student and Expatriate Challenges International Business and FDI Human Resource and Talent Management

Abstract

The policies and practices of U.S., West European, and Japanese multinationals differ with respect to the procedures used for selecting personnel to fill positions overseas and the training programs used to prepare candidates.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 615 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

1998EXPATRIATES' PSYCHOLOGICAL WITHDRAWAL FROM INTERNATIONAL ASSIGNMENTS: WORK, NONWORK, AND FAMILY INFLUENCES 1987Expatriate Selection, Training and Career‐Pathing: A Review and Critique 2007Institutional Environments, Staffing Strategies, and Subsidiary Performance 2006The changing nature of work and organizations: Implications for human resource management 1992Toward a Theoretical Framework of Repatriation Adjustment 2001The theory of met expectations applied to expatriate adjustment: the role of crosscultural training 1995THE INTERNATIONAL ASSIGNEE: THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF FACTORS PERCEIVED TO CONTRIBUTE TO SUCCESS 1993Initial examination of a model of intercultural adjustment

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.