No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
This article describes a novel assessment method used to examine Japanese and American teachers ’ ideas about what constitutes effective mathematics pedagogy. Forty American and 40 Japanese teachers independently evaluated either an American or Japanese mathematics lesson captured on videotape. Their comments were clas-sified into over 1600 idea units, which were then sorted into a hierarchy of categories derived from the data. Next, the authors hypothesized underlying ideal instructional scripts that could explain the patterns of responses. Whereas the U.S. teachers were supportive of both traditional and nontraditional elementary school mathematics instruction and had different scripts for the two lessons, the Japanese teachers had only one ideal lesson script that was closely tied to typical Japanese mathematics instruction. The findings suggest that U.S. teachers may have more culturally sanc-tioned options for teaching mathematics; however, Japanese teachers may have a more detailed and widely shared theory about how to teach effectively. Key words: Cross-cultural studies; Qualitative methods; Teacher beliefs; Teaching (role, style, methods)
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 138 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.