Math and Science Attitudes and Achievement at the Intersection of Gender and Ethnicity

Nicole Meredith Else-Quest · Concetta C. Mineo · Ashley Higgins

244 citations0/0 files storedPsychology of Women Quarterly

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Career Development and Diversity Education, Achievement, and Giftedness Science Education and Perceptions

Abstract

Despite gender similarities in math and science achievement, women continue to be underrepresented in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education and careers. Increasingly, researchers are looking to gender differences in STEM attitudes as the root of this disparity. Theoretical support for the importance of STEM attitudes comes from several theories within educational, social, and vocational psychology, including Eccles’ expectancy-value theory, which maintains that education-related choices are shaped by attitudes—namely, expectations of success and task value as well as self-concept. Yet, the studies testing this model generally have not taken into account the intersection of gender and ethnicity. The current study addresses this gap in the literature by describing gender differences in math and science attitudes and achievement among 367 White, African American, Latino/Latina, and Asian American 10th grade students in neighborhood public high schools from a large northeastern city. Male and female adolescents earned similar end-of-year grades in math and science, whereas Asian American students outperformed students from the other ethnic groups in math and science. Self-report data from paper-and-pencil surveys indicate significant gender differences in that male adolescents reported greater math self-concept and expectations of success and female adolescents reported more science value; gender differences did not vary across ethnic groups. Attitudes were strong predictors of achievement, consistent with hypotheses. To our knowledge, ours is the first study to examine math and science attitudes and achievement at the intersection of gender and ethnicity across four major ethnic groups. We discuss implications for efforts aimed at improving the representation of women in STEM.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 244 citations exist upstream.

References

1977Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.1985Social Foundations of Thought and Action : A Social Cognitive Theory 1990Endogenous Technological Change 1989Endogenous Technological Change 1978Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change 1994Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance 1997A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance.2005The gender similarities hypothesis.

Cited by

2016Intersectionality in Quantitative Psychological Research 2013The Influence of Female Role Models on Women’s Implicit Science Cognitions 2014Sex differences in mathematics and science achievement: A meta-analysis of National Assessment of Educational Progress assessments.2017Investigating Gender Differences in Mathematics and Science: Results from the 2011 Trends in Mathematics and Science Survey 2017Improving Career Decision Self-Efficacy and STEM Self-Efficacy in High School Girls: Evaluation of an Intervention

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.