Platform‐Driven Development of Product Families: Linking Theory with Practice

Johannes I.M. Halman · Adrian P. Hofer · Wim van Vuuren

254 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Product Innovation Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Product Development and Customization Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies Digital Platforms and Economics

Abstract

Firms in many industries increasingly are considering platform‐based approaches to reduce complexity and to better leverage investments in new product development, manufacturing, and marketing. However, a clear gap in literature still exists when it comes to discussing the problems and risks related to implementing and managing product families and their underlying platforms. Using a multiple‐case approach, we compare three technology‐driven companies in their definition of platform‐based product families, investigate their reasons for changing to platform‐driven development, and analyze how they implemented platform thinking in their development process and which risks they encountered in the process of creating and managing platform‐based product families. The field study shows that the companies involved in the study use a homogeneous concept of platform‐based product families and that they have similar reasons to turn to platform thinking and to encounter comparable risks. However, the companies analyzed use mainly product architecture as a basis for their platforms (and ignore many of the platform types advocated in literature), while on the other hand they show divergent applications of the platform concept regarding the combinations of product families and market applications. Through this exploratory study, some important white spots in literature became evident as well. In the discussion part of this article these white spots are discussed and directions for future platform research are proposed. The article concludes that given its importance, platform‐driven development of product families clearly deserves further research to provide more insight into strategic planning for new products.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 254 citations exist upstream.

References

1984Case Study Research: Design and Methods 1991Case Study Research: Design and Methods 1989Building Theories from Case Study Research 1990Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms 2000Design Rules 1995The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm 1999Mass customization: The new frontier in business competition 1977Content Analysis in Consumer Research

Cited by

2004Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field-Tested and Grounded Technological Rules 2014Architectural Leverage: Putting Platforms in Context 2006Creating Dynamic Capability: The Role of Intertemporal Integration, Knowledge Retention, and Interpretation 2008Innovation Field Orientation and Its Effect on Innovativeness and Firm Performance 2006Modularity in supply chains: a multiple case study in the construction industry 2008

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.