SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Effect of Attendance at a Training Session on Peer Reviewer Quality and Performance
3 references·16 citing·53 second hop
Effect of Attendance at a Training Session on Peer Reviewer Quality and Performance (1998)Effect of Attendance at a Training Sessio…Who Reviews the Reviewers? Feasibility of Using a Fictitious Manuscript to Evaluate Peer Reviewer Performance (1998)Who Reviews the Reviewers? Fe…Reliability of Editors' Subjective Quality Ratings of Peer Reviews of Manuscripts (1998)Reliability of Editors' Subje…The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)The reliability of peer revie…Knowledge and motivations of training in peer review: An international cross-sectional survey (2023)Knowledge and motivations of …Peer review in forensic science (2017)Peer review in forensic scien…Manuscript Rejection (2014)Manuscript RejectionA systematic review highlights a knowledge gap regarding the effectiveness of health-related training programs in journalology (2014)A systematic review highlight…Does mentoring new peer reviewers improve review quality? A randomized trial (2012)Does mentoring new peer revie…Longitudinal Trends in the Performance of Scientific Peer Reviewers (2010)Longitudinal Trends in the Pe…Differences in Editorial Board Reviewer Behavior Based on Gender (2010)Differences in Editorial Boar…Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research (2009)Quality of manuscript reviews…Peer Reviewer Training and Editor Support: Results From an International Survey of Nursing Peer Reviewers (2009)Peer Reviewer Training and Ed…Author Perception of Peer Review (2008)Author Perception of Peer Rev…Peer Reviewing E-Learning: Opportunities, Challenges, and Solutions (2007)Peer Reviewing E-Learning: Op…Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2006)Editorial peer review for imp…Responsible authorship and peer review (2002)Responsible authorship and pe…Effect of Written Feedback by Editors on Quality of Reviews (2002)Effect of Written Feedback by…Effect of structured workshop training on subsequent performance of journal peer reviewers (2002)Effect of structured workshop…Common Reasons for Rejecting Manuscripts at Medical Journals: A Survey of Editors and Peer Reviewers (2000)Common Reasons for Rejecting …Peer review in biomedical publication (1974)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review (1990)Author Perception of Peer Review (2002)The Relationship of Previous Training and Experience of Journal Peer Reviewers to Subsequent Review Quality (2007)What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them? (2008)EXPERT AND EXCEPTIONAL PERFORMANCE: Evidence of Maximal Adaptation to Task Constraints (1996)Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. (1999)The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (2006)Why training and specialization is needed for peer review: a case study of peer review for randomized controlled trials (2014)What happened to Popperian falsification? Publishing neutral and negative findings (2016)What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal? (1998)Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial (2004)Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2007)Authors’ and Editors’ Perspectives on Peer Review Quality in Three Scholarly Nursing Journals (2010)Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals (2012)Minimizing the Three Stages of Publication Bias (1990)The “Gender Gap” in Authorship of Academic Medical Literature — A 35-Year Perspective (2006)Beyond Bias and Barriers : Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering (2007)Citation gamesmanship: testing for evidence of ego bias in peer review (2012)Gender and geographical disparity in editorial boards of journals in psychology and neuroscience (2022)A bibliometric analysis of the gender gap in the authorship of leading medical journals (2023)Agreement among reviewers of review articles (1991)Validation of an index of the quality of review articles (1991)Multiple blinded reviews of the same two manuscripts. Effects of referee characteristics and publication language (1994)ORI Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of Research (2004)Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability. (2008)A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants (2010)Salience of Feedback on Error and Its Effect on EFL Writing Quality (1986)Development of the Review Quality Instrument (RQI) for Assessing Peer Reviews of Manuscripts (1999)Statistical Reviewers Improve Reporting in Biomedical Articles: A Randomized Trial (2007)Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: a methodological systematic review (2019)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Scientific Culture and Educational Research (2002)Scientific Culture and Educational Research (2005)Self and Peer Assessment in School and University: Reliability, Validity and Utility (2006)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals (2016)A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review (2017)Complex Problem Solving: Principles and Mechanisms (1992)The ethics of peer review in bioethics (2013)Complex Problem Solving (2014)Editorial: Peer Review and the Editorial Process - A Look Behind the Curtain (2014)Inter-rater reliability and validity of peer reviews in an interdisciplinary field (2017)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Alternatives to Peer Review: Novel Approaches for Research Evaluation (2011)A Stronger Post-Publication Culture Is Needed for Better Science (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1991The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation496 cited
  • 1998Who Reviews the Reviewers? Feasibility of Using a Fictitious Manuscript to Evaluate Peer Reviewer Performance141 cited
  • 1998Reliability of Editors' Subjective Quality Ratings of Peer Reviews of Manuscripts122 cited

Cited by

  • 2012Does mentoring new peer reviewers improve review quality? A randomized trial89 cited
  • 2002Effect of Written Feedback by Editors on Quality of Reviews76 cited
  • 2006Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies74 cited
  • 2010Differences in Editorial Board Reviewer Behavior Based on Gender74 cited
  • 2010Longitudinal Trends in the Performance of Scientific Peer Reviewers63 cited
  • 2014A systematic review highlights a knowledge gap regarding the effectiveness of health-related training programs in journalology62 cited
  • 2009Peer Reviewer Training and Editor Support: Results From an International Survey of Nursing Peer Reviewers59 cited
  • 2007Peer Reviewing E-Learning: Opportunities, Challenges, and Solutions55 cited
  • 2000Common Reasons for Rejecting Manuscripts at Medical Journals: A Survey of Editors and Peer Reviewers54 cited
  • 2002Responsible authorship and peer review53 cited
  • 2002

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Effect of structured workshop training on subsequent performance of journal peer reviewers
53 cited
  • 2017Peer review in forensic science52 cited
  • 2014Manuscript Rejection50 cited
  • 2009Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research36 cited
  • 2008Author Perception of Peer Review34 cited
  • 2023Knowledge and motivations of training in peer review: An international cross-sectional survey29 cited